applying psychodrama
Adam Blatner
adam at blatner.com
Sun Aug 20 13:52:35 CDT 2006
Dear Colleagues,
I've contemplated the predicament of psychodrama in the current field of psychotherapy and one possible analysis goes like this:
1. There are many competing forms. The more competition, the harder it is for psychodrama to be heard.
2. Many clients are most reluctant to engage in enactment, as this process is in their own fantasy excessively vulnerable to judgment by others. It's performance anxiety doubled. Warm-up within the time allocated is hardly possible, and might require a series of individual sessions or ordinary verbal group sessions.
(We should not underestimate the gradient of spontaneity and risk taking, and the numbers or percentages of people on the lower end of this spectrum. For many, any activity that involves movement threatens to betray the person by way of his or her nonverbal communications, voice tone, etc., and there is a fear of being judged for that which is not subject to voluntary and conscious control.)
3. What if the best way to get the many wonderful insights of Moreno's work into the mainstream of not just clinical work, but business, education, and other social institutions, is to apply psychodrama's components separately? i.e.,
sociometry applied role theory role training role playing for diagnosis spontaneity training
promoting the value of creativity playfulness etc.
Of course they can work especially well when they are used together, but my point is that they need not be, and for some clients, the enactment element may be evocative of too much of a sense of vulnerability...
but that doesn't mean that some or all the other components can't be artfully woven in
thoughts?
Adam Blatner, M.D.
(please reply to adam at blatner.com)
website: www.blatner.com/adam/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/list_grouptalkweb.org/attachments/20060820/d08412a6/attachment.html
More information about the List
mailing list