[***SPAM*** Score/Req: 08.1/5.0] RE: List Digest, Vol 1, Issue 24
Isabel Malone
imalone at nphs.com
Wed Jul 12 18:06:47 CDT 2006
Cathy:
A good idea.
IZI Malone
----- Original Message -----
From: <CathyNugent at comcast.net>
To: <list at grouptalkweb.org>; <list at grouptalkweb.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 1:06 PM
Subject: [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 08.1/5.0] RE: List Digest, Vol 1, Issue 24
> Hello, everyone - This is Cathy Nugent, a psychodramatist in Maryland. I
> have been silent on the listserv, but have enjoyed the stimulating
> interchanges. I wanted to comment on the issues raised by the Alaska
> Supreme Court decision and Adam's commentary. One promising innovation in
> the psychiatric field has been the use of "advance directives." In the
> mental health arena, these are similar to advance directives that people
> develop in relation to serious illness and use of extraordinary measures
to
> sustain life (i.e., people sign directives indicating whether or not they
> wish to be resusitated, etc.)..... In psychiatry, clients who are at risk
> of decompensating and becoming mentally incapacitated, have the
opportunity
> when they are in a clear state to develop a plan for how they would like
> family, friends, significant others, and mental health professionals to
> intervene if they have a relapse and become psychotic or otherwise
> disabled. The client may indicate in the advance directive that he or she
> wishes to be given medication, or that other interventions be tried before
> medication, or that other steps be taken. Some mental health hopsitals
and
> systems are using advance directives with success, and consumer groups
seem
> to favor the idea since it promotes client integrity and autonomy.....
>
> I hope everyone is well and in good spirits.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Cathy
>
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: list-request at grouptalkweb.org
> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 12:00:01 -0500
> To: list at grouptalkweb.org
> Subject: List Digest, Vol 1, Issue 24
>
>
> Send List mailing list submissions to
> list at grouptalkweb.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> list-request at grouptalkweb.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> list-owner at grouptalkweb.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of List digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. new article (Adam Blatner)
> 2. involuntary psychiatry (Adam Blatner)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:00:55 -0500
> From: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>
> Subject: new article
> To: <list at grouptalkweb.org>
> Message-ID: <008301c6a5bb$9a10d6a0$2f01a8c0 at dell>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi, for anyone who may be interested, I just had published a new article:
> -- Blatner, A. (2006). Enacting the new academy: sociodrama as a
> powerful tool in higher education. ReVision: A Journal of Consciousness &
> Transformation, 28 (3), 30 - 35.
>
> I'm working on some other things, probably due in Fall.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
/pipermail/list_grouptalkweb.org/attachments/20060712/cba6daf0/attachment-00
> 01.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:13:05 -0500
> From: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>
> Subject: involuntary psychiatry
> To: <list at grouptalkweb.org>
> Message-ID: <009901c6a5bd$4d51db50$2f01a8c0 at dell>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> This article speaks to an interesting and quite complex problem, a problem
> of social
> policy. As the only MD psychiatrist who is also a psychodramatist in the
> USA, I have mixed
> reactions.
> On one hand, I'm somewhat inclined to support such challenges. I
agree
> with about a
> third to a half of the arguments of Thomas Szasz, the libertarian
> psychiatrist. I fear
> that there is a tendency to support the convenience of the administration
> in any large
> organization or institution, whether it be a hospital, religious
> denomination, political
> structure, ASGPP, ANZPA, whatever. There are almost always reformers
within
> most large
> organizations, and this tension keeps things cooking.
> The problem often deals with the folks who are at the edge of
> breaking the law in
> several ways: Those who are chronically homeless and create for those
> around them, not
> only themselves, a hygiene hazard, smells, excretion in public, etc.
> Others are clearly suicidal and we must come to a public policy
> decision as to what
> we collectively must do.
>
> Others are a drain on their family for the aforementioned reasons,
and
> the family
> members are seeking some relief--these stories can be quite heart-rending.
> The number of
> free-spirited folks who don't hurt anyone is rather limited. The problem
> often involves
> types of harm that are in a fuzzy area of not quite criminal.
>
> The dual-diagnosis problems of illness compounded by drug taking
has
> all become
> worse with the growing epidemic of methamphetamine addiction.
>
> And so forth...
>
> I'm concerned because although I am wary about tendencies within
> psychiatry to
> over-medicate, there is an equal if not greater tendency in our culture
> towards a rather
> global anti-psychiatry stance. The best policy requires the spirit of
> spontaneity,
> responding in the moment to the needs of the situation, unhampered by the
> cultural
> conserves of overgeneralizations, abstractions, artificial categories.
> I expect to see some further news about this and will be open to
> questions.
> Warmly, Adam
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <k.kade at att.net>
> To: <list at grouptalkweb.org>; <list at grouptalkweb.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 12:13 AM
> Subject: Alaskan Supreme Court recent ruling
>
>
> > Hello from Alaska. I love this group talk...It helps me feel connected
> up here in the
> > NOrth. This is an article about a recent ruling here...
> >
> > *FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
> >
> > June 30, 2006
> >
> > *
> > ****FREEDOMS FOR ALL,
> > IN TIME FOR THE 4th???***
> >
> > Alaska Supreme Court Strikes Down Forced Psychiatric Drugging Procedures
> >
> > *
> > In a resounding affirmation of personal liberty and freedom, the Alaska
> > Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in /Myers v. Alaska
> > Psychiatric Institute/ today. The court found Alaska's forced
> > psychiatric drugging regime to be unconstitutional when the state forces
> > someone to take psychiatric medications without proving it to be in
> > their best interests or when there are less restrictive alternatives.
> >
> > Faith Myers, the appellant in the case, reacted to the decision saying,
> > "It makes all of my suffering worthwhile."
> >
> > Myers' attorney, Jim Gottstein, said "By requiring the least intrusive
> > alternative to forced psychiatric drugging, this decision has the
> > potential to change the face of current psychiatric practice,
> > dramatically improving the lives of people who now find themselves at
> > the wrong end of a hypodermic needle.??o While he acknowledged that
some
> > people find psychiatric drugs helpful, Gottstein said he pursued this
> > case because, in addition to the drugs' serious physical health risks,
> > he is concerned about the rights of those who find them both unhelpful
> > and intolerable. He continued, ??oFor people who want to try non-drug
> > approaches, the research is very clear that many will have much better
> > long-term outcomes, including complete recovery after being diagnosed
> > with serious mental illness. This decision restores the rights of
> > those people to pursue that potential."
> >
> > The Alaska Supreme Court decision noted the trial court's concern that
> > the statute did not allow the court to consider the problems with the
> > drugs even though "a valid debate exists in the medically/psychiatric
> > community as to the safety and effectiveness of the proposed treatment
> > plan." With this decision, trial courts are now required to consider
> > the safety and effectiveness of the drugs in deciding whether the
> > proposed psychiatric drugging is in the patient's best interest.
> >
> > The Court's Decision also makes specific mention that Alaska Statutes
> > require the hospital to honor a patient's previously expressed desires
> > regarding psychiatric medications.
> >
> > The full decision can be found on the Internet at
> > http://psychrights.org/States/Alaska/CaseOne/MyersOpinion.pdf.
> >
> > Detailed background about The Law Project for Psychiatric Rights, a
> > non-profit organization, is available on the PsychRights web site:
> > http://psychrights.org/.
> >
> > # # #
> >
> > CONTACT:
> > Jim Gottstein
> > 907 274-7686
> > jim at psychrights.org <mailto:jim at psychrights.org>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > James B. (Jim) Gottstein, Esq.
> >
> > Law Project for Psychiatric Rights
> > 406 G Street, Suite 206
> > Anchorage, Alaska 99501
> > Phone: (907) 274-7686) Fax: (907) 274-9493
> > jim at psychrights.org
> > http://psychrights.org/
> >
> > * * *Psych Rights* ??
> > * Law Project for
> > Psychiatric Rights
> >
> > *The Law Project for Psychiatric Rights is a public interest law firm
> > devoted to the defense of people facing the horrors of unwarranted
> > forced psychiatric drugging. We are further dedicated to exposing the
> > truth about these drugs and the courts being misled into ordering people
> > to be drugged and subjected to other brain and body damaging
> > interventions against their will. Extensive information about this is
> > available on our web site, http://psychrights.org/. Please donate
> > generously. Our work is fueled with your IRS 501(c) tax deductible
> > donations. Thank you for your ongoing help and support.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
>
>
> > Grouptalk mailing list
> > List at grouptalkweb.org
> > http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
> >
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.10/385 - Release Date: 7/11/2006
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Grouptalk mailing list
> List at grouptalkweb.org
> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>
>
>
> End of List Digest, Vol 1, Issue 24
> ***********************************
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web - Check your email from the web at
> http://mail2web.com/ .
>
>
>
> Grouptalk mailing list
> List at grouptalkweb.org
> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>
This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake, please let us know by e-mail reply and delete it from your system; you may not copy this message or disclose its contents to anyone. Please send us by fax any message containing deadlines as incoming e-mails are not screened for response deadlines. The integrity and security of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet.
More information about the List
mailing list