For your information - Sociatry cont'd
HV Psychodrama
hvpi at hvc.rr.com
Mon Aug 20 17:12:52 CDT 2007
I agree with Adam that it is a good thing for this to be on grouptalk. I also wrote something to grouptalk but it didn't get posted.
Rebecca
----- Original Message -----
From: Kim Cox
To: ASGPP Listserv
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 5:28 PM
Subject: For your information - Sociatry cont'd
Hi all,
I am forwarding the following with Adam Blatner's encouragement - I invite you to read the discussion and respond with your thoughts, whatever they may be...
Regards,
Kim
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Adam Blatner <adam at blatner.com>
Date: Aug 20, 2007 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: Sociatry
To: Kim Cox < kimbo.cox at gmail.com>
Hi Kim,
You may not want to brave the listserve, but personally I think this should have been sent over the listserve. Your reactions will no doubt be representative of many. Some like this "Let's all start getting all het up about social concerns and those that aren't with us are scardey-cats" excitement, but many others are more moderate in tone. The excited ones find the moderates to be part of the problem, while the moderates find the zealous to be counter-productive, methinks.
The fun of the listserve is that you really are free to be you and ask for input. Interesting, though, how few people do speak up. Is it reluctance to encounter the more zealous, or buck what they perceive to be a norm when it is really just one or a few people's opinions?
If you want, you may send this along with your response and your previous comments below right to the listserve. I think lots of folks should hear a bit of mixing-it-up. You haven't been uncivil, only a bit indignant. Some friction like that can be stimulating and even healing. Hm?
Indeed, your spirit intrigues me--- what are some of your current roles and interests? Maybe I can help you network or stimulate you in these pursuits.
Warmly, Adam
*******************
Ed's response:
no one is yelling,
people are simply sharing
and yes, there is massive denial,
of which we are all part.
Denial about the collapse of the environment
in particular, and in particular as Americans,
and the collapse of the economic structure of this country.
For me, I am most interested in the work Moreno offered
about society. That's all I have to say. Best of luck to you
in your life and work.
Ed
P.S.
If you ever want to have an off-line back
channel exchange about why we are in denial,
in a kind-of-like complex PTSD society dilemma,
I would be happy to share that research in an
exchange.
----- Original Message -----
From: Kim Cox
To: Edward Schreiber
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: Sociatry
But Ed is it your place to judge me??? or anyone else on this listserv?
You want to talk about denial, we can talk about denial, as I have none of it, especially when it comes to what's happening in our world. I take offense that you continue to make judgments about me without walking in MY shoes first.
"Most people are hiding..." --- how do you know this? Do you know "most people"??? I barely know you and you're making assumptions and judgments without really asking - instead you get on this listserv and "yell" about what I and the rest of the listserv "should" be doing - and that does not inspire me to join your cause, I'd rather stick to the causes I'm already fighting for, thanks very much (of which you have no knowledge about because you don't know me).
Kim
On 8/20/07, Edward Schreiber <edwschreiber at earthlink.net> wrote:
fine, but most people are just hiding, afraid of the reality
we are facing about the earth and your not smacks a bit
of that kind of denial. best,
Ed
On Aug 20, 2007, at 8:16 AM, Kim Cox wrote:
Hi Ed,
Thanks for your response. I would be interested in your writings about this fourth dimension, as I don't know much about it. However, I would encourage you to think about what articles to send before you send them - following Amy Goodman's points on the media and how we are fed information that may not be factual, including info re. the environment. In essence, as we've discussed, I'd rather read your own thoughts rather than those from some generic reporter from a newspaper.
Kim
On 8/20/07, Edward Schreiber < edwschreiber at earthlink.net> wrote:
Hi Kim,
Thanks for the update.
I am not interested in starting another listserve or blog so my decision to speak my thoughts on grouptalk holds firm.
Your comment however about framing such things as a Globe article with what might be done from a Morenean perspective
holds great truth and in the future I will do just that. However that noted Moreno wrote extensively about politics and social
issues and how to address them, and his ideas strayed off from psychodrama, but that straying leads to further ideas about
sociatry as a forth dimension of his work. We have developed Dr. Moreno's work into a triadic system which unfortunately
is not accurate. His work is a quadradic system, the forth being sociatry. Many of us (many more from South America
and Europe than the US) are already looking at sociatry as a forth catagory of his work and we are in a collective phase of defining
sociatry (but it must be rooted from his work and not our interpretation of his work). That process is in process as we speak.
Global warming and climate change fall under the heading of sociatric work of Moreno, and so my further posts, even using material from the
globe will include my understanding of the 4th dimension of Moreno, sociatry. How did this sound to you?
On Aug 19, 2007, at 8:45 PM, Kim Cox wrote:
Ed,
I'm just sending this directly to you to move it from the listserv. My question to the listserv had to do with the nature of the listserv and understanding if any rules were ever set, as what is usually the case when listservs are established.
I am not trying to take away your free speech on this listserv, and for you to interpret my comments like that concerns me.
Of course we are in a country of free speech, and you're right, I don't have to read anything you write.
I never said that I do not want to read your thoughts about Moreno's ideas about society, that's completely different from forwarding news articles about the environment from the Boston Globe. Part of why I am on the listserv is to learn more about different psychodrama ideas and perspectives.
But your e-mail that followed the article came across as "yelling" (as Adam Blatner mentioned), and combined with the article, I felt like I wasn't on the psychodrama listserv anymore, I was now on a new political-environmental listserv that was "heating up" with current event news.
I am already on True Majority, Moveon.org, Save Darfur, among other listservs, and already receive a ton of e-mail in my Inbox. When e-mails come in from the grouplist, I look forward to reading them, but if they become purely political in nature I will disconnect. That is why I offered the idea to move it to a blog (or as someone else suggested, the Forum), where those who want to engage in this debate/dialogue with you can join you there.
Please know that I do respect you and your views, but the way you are currently communicating them to me via the listserv turns me off completely and does not inspire me to join your cause. I do look forward to reading more postings from you, if they are a little more focused on psychodrama/sociometry, and not just what you read in the newspaper that day or what you heard in the news.
If something I have written today is unclear, please ask me, I'd be glad to answer. But I would really like to end this, as I feel like I've expressed my feelings about it, as you have yours, and I just hope that you can understand my perspective.
Peace,
Kim
On 8/19/07, Edward Schreiber < edwschreiber at earthlink.net> wrote:
As far as I know, this is still a place of free speech.
My suggestion is if you do not wish to read my thoughts,
about Moreno's ideas about society, as I understand those
ideas, then I suggest you simply ignore anything I offer.
Just don't read anything I write.
Best,
Ed
On Aug 19, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Kim Cox wrote:
> Hi Ed,
>
> Some of what you say has merit, but as far as the ASGPP group
> listserv, I personally do not think this dialogue belongs on this
> listserv, and would be better suited for your own personal blog to
> invite people to come and read and respond, and dialogue with you
> further.
>
> I am wondering if other listserv members agree?
>
> And also wondering/trying to recall if there were any "rules" ever
> set up for this listserv as to what kinds of postings are allowed/
> encouraged/discouraged?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kim
>
> Grouptalk mailing list
> List at grouptalkweb.org
> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
--
"Real is better than perfect." - Dorothy Satten
"Do one thing every day that scares you." - Eleanor Roosevelt
http://zpurplefreak.livejournal.com/profile
http://www.myspace.com/zeepurplefreak
--
"Real is better than perfect." - Dorothy Satten
"Do one thing every day that scares you." - Eleanor Roosevelt
http://zpurplefreak.livejournal.com/profile
http://www.myspace.com/zeepurplefreak
--
"Real is better than perfect." - Dorothy Satten
"Do one thing every day that scares you." - Eleanor Roosevelt
http://zpurplefreak.livejournal.com/profile
http://www.myspace.com/zeepurplefreak
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.0/961 - Release Date: 8/19/2007 7:27 AM
--
"Real is better than perfect." - Dorothy Satten
"Do one thing every day that scares you." - Eleanor Roosevelt
http://zpurplefreak.livejournal.com/profile
http://www.myspace.com/zeepurplefreak
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grouptalk mailing list
List at grouptalkweb.org
http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://grouptalkweb.org/pipermail/list_grouptalkweb.org/attachments/20070820/94b6b3c1/attachment.html
More information about the List
mailing list