For your information - Sociatry cont'd

[Edward Schreiber]

About all this, the only thing in Kim's
exchange with me that I find disingenuous
is that when Kim wrote to me, off-line, to
me directly and I responded to her off-line (not through
grouptalk) I consider that a private, not a public exchange.

So I am not happy that my off line exchange was put onto
grouptalk without my permission.

If I had an exchange with Adam, or Zerka, or Ann, or the many
I've had with Rebecca off-line and then took those email exchanges
and put them on grouptalk without their specific OK, it's a form of  
"theft" in my
view.  Taking a private exchange and making it public, as Kim has
done violates the spirit of a personal exchange.  It is clear now that
Kim is interested in fighting with me and not really learning from an
exchange.

So I'm done with it.   I will share more about sociatry, as my
research progresses, and will offer that with the kind of integrity I  
demand
of myself.   Ripping off a private exchange without permission of the  
other
is not how I would to suggest this or any exchange happens.

Thanks.

Ed