bl2ed9407
thana ag
anathga at hotmail.com
Sat Dec 1 21:49:52 CST 2007
Dear Adam,
Thanks for recommending the book,but more so for sharing your thoughts.
Which makes me add my few cents,as someone who has been intrigued by other ways of knowing. what is reality etc
1. Kabbalists' name for ego is "the desire to receive" ,that is all we are,a bundle of desires to receive.
Which resonates with your "antenna" hypothesis....
2. In hebrew the word for world is "olam" which derives from the root "to obscure","to hide". . What does it obscure ? The full view of the universe. Ours is the lowest, the darkest of places,where we receive a picture of reality based on our 5 senses. Those who use other senses,more refined senses - will experience different worlds, or realities.
3. Kabballah has a whole method about reaching the full view: 125 steps to be precise. Kabballists were known to transcends the boundaries of time and space, though I doubt they would use their abilities to locate a missing harp...During Independence war in Israel apparently , the late Rav Ashlag,the last great Kabbalist made his predictions about the outcome of the war known to authorities. Could've that somehow affected the outcome?! One could argue that point. The less anxiety the more spontaneity etc .He also wanted kabballah to be taught in schools.: unless we evolve as humans we are forever stuck in this dark,limited world that we believe is all there ,sbecause our senses tell us so. Once we changed our view-the view changes.
3.I seem to find similarities between some of Moreno's ideas,and the Kabballah : and leap with joy.
anath
From: adam at blatner.com
To: edwhug at verizon.net
Subject: Re: bl2ed9407
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:59:23 -0600
CC: list at grouptalkweb.org
Dear Ed &
Grouptalk, I recently came upon the following book:
Mayer, Elizabeth
Lloyd. (2007). Extraordinary knowing: science, skepticism, and the inexplicable
powers of the human mind. New York: Bantam. www.bantamdell.com This
highly-reputed, well-established psychoanalyst died, unfortunately, soon after
writing this book. It's surprisingly good---seems different from just another
book on
parapsychology. Her depth psychology angle adds some depth, so I
feel drawn to read it out loud to my wife,
Allee.
If we concede that a
truly anomalous experience occurs not as a random event---this is where the
dynamics overlap with synchronicity---then we are invited to question our entire
paradigm of causality.
By the way, I
have a hypothesis that explains all this: The mind is not a manufacturer and
transmitter, but rather an antenna, a receiver, especially of more refined forms
of knowledge. In its less-evolved functioning---reptilian and mammalian brain,
chronic defensiveness and simple limbic system functioning, much of the mind's
functioning is relatively rooted in more conventional theories of reflex and
child development, basic psychoanalysis, etc. When the limbic system relaxes,
though, opens to the neurocortex, not only thinking can enter the picture (in
the spirit of Goleman's Emotional Intelligence book in 1995), but, I suggest
(very tentatively), opens to other dimensions that cannot be explained in terms
of ordinary cognition. The savant syndrome, related conditions with musical
ability recently described by Oliver Sacks, and many other phenomenon transcend
any regular paradigms of mind.
(I somehow
see a parallel with astronomy. In the last thirty years or so, evidence for dark
matter and then dark energy has accumulated. We don't know what these are, but
it seems that as far as the dark matter, it, or something, accounts for 95% of
the mass in the cosmos; and in terms of the seeming acceleration of distance, in
its aggregate and
distance, dark energy may express perhaps a quantity equal
to or greater to the explainable types of energy. So more folks are coming to a
fresh start place after the period of the spread of science and its extension
into scientism between the mid-18th and early 21st century: New frontiers of
staggering degrees of mystery are coming to the surface of our collective
awareness.)
I envision many implications here: What really is hypnosis?
What if most kids in a generation or two are taught self-hypnosis as a matter of
course, like learning to read or write? And also intuition training and related
skills?
What if we accept a
dimensional depth in our lives without having to presume to know what it
means---leaving it without dogma---but yet of course it becomes a powerful
question that shifts the nature of spirituality away from the authority of an
intermediate function (the clergy, the rituals), and towards a more democratic,
populist---I don't know the right words---reaching for people to discover and
explore the spiritual domains using their own symbol systems?
What if
therapy begins to shift toward acknowledging this dimension?
Theory 2:
Psychic phenomena increases with expectation, meditation, relaxation, feeling
safe, letting oneself go into trance. We as therapists should talk
about extraordinary knowing in as matter-of-fact as taking a sexual history, or
a spiritual history. We might be surprised by the way people will talk about it
nowadays, but only if asked in a truly respectful manner. Well, I'm just warming
up to all this. Open to your comments. warmly, Adam
----- Original Message -----
From:
Edward Hug
To: Adam Blatner
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 6:38
AM
Subject: Re: bl2ed9407
Ho Adam ...
I knew the elf was in there somewhere peeking
out. I look forward to your Christmas designs.
Yes, neuroscience cuts both ways. It is reductive
science, fragmentary and un-wholistic. But it is science, and so gets the
attention of the money people .. agencies and all. But it is also supportive
of more integrative, wholistic approaches .. psychotherapies, pschoanalysis,
even psychodrama. And actually, once you get into it, there is a kind of Awe
in it. Just read Oliver Sacks and you get that there is a Ghost in the
Machine. Reductionistic language and terms of reference in service of that
which is so obviously beyond it. The spiritual aspect comes through without
using the spiritualistic language (so common in New Age blather). So yes, it
is a bridge in this way too!
I guess you've seen Horvatin & Schreiber's
"Quintessential
Zerka". I had a peek into it on Amazon. Seems well written. Captivating.
At $54 I'll wait for the paperback though.
Is your latest paper on your website?
Cheers ... Ed
----- Original Message -----
From:
Adam Blatner
To: Edward Hug
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 10:56
PM
Subject: Re: bl2ed9407
Hi Ed, what fun. Well, I'm turning my attention
to a new game, mixing the kinds of drawings / cartoons I've been putting on
my Christmas Holiday letters for 27 years with the emergent playful
elf-based philosophy.
An
activity of seeking a kind of wisdom within folly. So this comment below
seems particularly apropos.
EH: Ah yes ... that golden "10% ... where is it
to be found? Is it to be found somewhere OUTSIDE the folly, or is it to be
found WITHIN THE FOLLY ITSELF? My feeling is the latter. What we CALL
"folly" may be wisdom dressed up to fool us .. or rather, to fool our
rational way of thinking. Rather than "devaluing", I like to think it useful
to go exploring for wisdom within that which others devalue. Nor do I feel
pessimistic about all this. Funny thing is, I think the Elf part of you
already knows this!
As for the other things, well, it
sounds as if we are in pretty much agreement. The idea of using neuroscience
to bridge intrigues me. I think psychodrama is wilting ever further. Did you
hear the journal might be closed down and perhaps sold from lack of
contributions?
So my
latest paper says let's unpack Moreno's best ideas and see where they can be
useful.
Warmly,
Adam
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free
Edition.
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.5/988 - Release Date:
9/4/2007 9:14 AM
_________________________________________________________________
Put your friends on the big screen with Windows Vista® + Windows Live™.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/shop/specialoffers.mspx?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_CPC_MediaCtr_bigscreen_102007
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://grouptalkweb.org/pipermail/list_grouptalkweb.org/attachments/20071202/fe0d1413/attachment.html
More information about the List
mailing list