a response to a grieving community & confidentiality

[PATRICIA DESERT]

Dear Ann--I deeply appreciate your calling our attention to this.  If I had experiences with Clare as Manuela and Connie had I think I would have shared them too, entirely forgetting the confidentiality aspect.  Thank you for reminding us.  Patti  

----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ann Hale<mailto:annehale at swva.net> 
  To: grouptalk<mailto:list at grouptalkweb.org> 
  Cc: iagp<mailto:iagp-psychodrama at yahoogroups.com> 
  Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 9:03 PM
  Subject: a response to a grieving community


  I understand Connie and Manuela's descriptions of being at Boughton Place in January and with Clare Danielsson  as a desire to reassure a grieving community that Clare was actively appreciated by many and had moments of being surrounded by a loving community.  I am however disturbed by the description of what for me would be private moments and ones which I would like to have held in confidence.  Confidentiality is held as a high value in our community and death of a person does not waive the right to privacy.

  I apologize if this sounds like a lecture. I do not mean it to be nor to detract from a positive desire given by Connie and Manuela to share an important moment of theirs with Clare.  The fact of a person having a treatment, the experience of the reiki person and the ceremony details cause in me an alarm. Confidentiality can be breached for the best of intentions.
  Ann E. Hale, M.,A., TEP
  Grouptalk mailing list
  List at grouptalkweb.org
  http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/list_grouptalkweb.org/attachments/20070211/490c59b3/attachment.html