forum

[Adam Blatner]

Dear Anath, why did you re-send this email, and with no comment by you?
     1. The whole dialogue was stimulated by a misunderstanding: I was asking about who 
was using the ASGPP forum, but I forgot to specify, and some folks thought I meant the way 
grouptalk functions in some ways like a forum. But I was talking about the medium of the 
website-Forum at the ASGPP website, not grouptalk.
    2. Then Ed Schreiber chided me for my doubts, so I went to the forum. I'll play the 
game and do some discourse there, but I'm still a little reserved. Still, I'll check in 
there every few weeks.
     3. Marianne then asked how many people are checking in with grouptalk, and you 
responded, perhaps to her, but you didn't say why you responded. Since you included a 
number of previous emails, it's not clear what you're trying to express. Maybe, hey, I'm 
here as part of grouptalk. Or maybe that you have more comments but pressed send before 
you could put them in.
      Warmly, Adam
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "thana ag" <anathga at hotmail.com>
To: <mariann at fidalgo.net>; <hvpi at hvc.rr.com>; <adam at blatner.com>; <list at grouptalkweb.org>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: forum


>
>
>
>>From: "Marianne Shapiro" <mariann at fidalgo.net>
>>To: "HV Psychodrama" <hvpi at hvc.rr.com>, "Adam Blatner" 
>><adam at blatner.com>,<list at grouptalkweb.org>
>>Subject: Re: forum
>>Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 15:07:17 -0700
>>
>>Dear Adam ,Rebecca and All,
>>     Hey hey hey  I am speaking up on behalf of the lurkers out there--and
>>there must be many of us. Is there a way of counting up how many hits these
>>grouptalk e mails receive? Let's try t
>>his old fashion hand count. Anybody out there in space who is reading this,
>>just hit reply all, with the message that you've read it, so we can see an
>>average of who reads what. I am not a name anybody knows much, so maybe
>>there wouldn't be many replies back , but someone else could try it, just to
>>see.
>>      I did not think that Adam was implying that the rest of us, us
>>grouptalk lurkers, are unimportant.   Although I hardly ever respond, it
>>doesn't mean I am not participating . I live in a smallish community--but
>>not far from 2 TEPS, and my husband Bob is a CP and I am a PAT. Among us, we
>>have 3 on going groups a week at our house, plus monthly workshops,  and I
>>appreciate the on going stimulation that Grouptalk provides.  I just want to
>>send my appreciation for the discussions, debates,  thoughts, articles,
>>links, diversity, connection, intelligence,  and self revealing that
>>Grouptalk provides for me, and Adam does seem to be the instigator of much
>>of this. . this does help me to feel and be more connected to the larger
>>Psychodrama community and also to shape and enhance my own thinking and
>>learning about this large and complex process.
>>Thanks be to the Creator, inside, around and among us. Marianne
>>