definitions

[edwschreiber at earthlink.net]

I would be confortable if we researched Dr. Moreno's original definitions
and posted them.  Clearly everything (as least as far as I can see) is defined
either by Dr. Moreno or by Zerka Moreno.

Ed S.

-----Original Message-----
>From: Adam Blatner <adam at blatner.com>
>Sent: Mar 15, 2007 8:57 PM
>To: list at grouptalkweb.org
>Subject: definitions
>
>Dear Colleagues,
>          One need I think is growing is that of a clear, agreed-upon glossary in our 
>field. As yet, there is none, and many of the lesser-known terms may never be presented or 
>taught by the majority of trainers. They are idiosyncratic to the teachings of only a few.
>      I have asked folks to help with this in the past, because what is needed is some 
>degree of consensus. I cannot pretend to be "the" spokesman-authority.
>   Perhaps if some minimal number  --at least four and perhaps a few more-- of recognized 
>trainers could agree on a definition, and this could then be posted, it might begin to be 
>a bit official.
>        Definitions have been an important element in the professionalization and 
>scientific status of any group, whether it be electronics or mathematics.
>       Your comments and thoughts will be welcome. Warmly, Adam Blatner
>
>
>Grouptalk mailing list
>List at grouptalkweb.org
>http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org