definitions

[HV Psychodrama]

Dear Ed,
I certainly think that the Moreno's definitions are a starting point, but as 
cultural conserves they may have inspired  spontaneous new uses which might 
change a definition or two.
Rebecca



From: <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
To: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>; <list at grouptalkweb.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: definitions


>I would be confortable if we researched Dr. Moreno's original definitions
> and posted them.  Clearly everything (as least as far as I can see) is 
> defined
> either by Dr. Moreno or by Zerka Moreno.
>
> Ed S.
>
> -----Original Message-----
>>From: Adam Blatner <adam at blatner.com>
>>Sent: Mar 15, 2007 8:57 PM
>>To: list at grouptalkweb.org
>>Subject: definitions
>>
>>Dear Colleagues,
>>          One need I think is growing is that of a clear, agreed-upon 
>> glossary in our
>>field. As yet, there is none, and many of the lesser-known terms may never 
>>be presented or
>>taught by the majority of trainers. They are idiosyncratic to the 
>>teachings of only a few.
>>      I have asked folks to help with this in the past, because what is 
>> needed is some
>>degree of consensus. I cannot pretend to be "the" spokesman-authority.
>>   Perhaps if some minimal number  --at least four and perhaps a few 
>> more-- of recognized
>>trainers could agree on a definition, and this could then be posted, it 
>>might begin to be
>>a bit official.
>>        Definitions have been an important element in the 
>> professionalization and
>>scientific status of any group, whether it be electronics or mathematics.
>>       Your comments and thoughts will be welcome. Warmly, Adam Blatner
>>
>>
>>Grouptalk mailing list
>>List at grouptalkweb.org
>>http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>
>
> Grouptalk mailing list
> List at grouptalkweb.org
> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>