List Digest, Vol 11, Issue 1 magazine article-sociometry/middle east

Edward Schreiber edwschreiber at earthlink.net
Wed May 2 06:44:03 CDT 2007


Hi Linda,
The article was in the April New Republic about fighting terrorism;
on one page there appeared to be a kind of sociogram.  That's it.
Tom Treadwell scanned it, if you write to him he can send it to you I
suspect.
Ed


On May 2, 2007, at 7:34 AM, Linda Ciotola wrote:

> Hello All: a few weeks ago someone mentioned an article in a  
> magazine (The
> New Republic?) written by a psychodramatist , using sociometry to  
> examine
> the middle east problems. I have looked for it without success. Could
> someone please give me all the info I need to find it. Thanks so  
> much. Linda
> Ciotola
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: list-bounces at grouptalkweb.org [mailto:list- 
> bounces at grouptalkweb.org]
> On Behalf Of list-request at grouptalkweb.org
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 1:00 PM
> To: list at grouptalkweb.org
> Subject: List Digest, Vol 11, Issue 1
>
> Send List mailing list submissions to
> 	list at grouptalkweb.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	list-request at grouptalkweb.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	list-owner at grouptalkweb.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of List digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: ASGPP Conference (Adam Blatner)
>    2. Re: ASGPP Conference (Edward Schreiber)
>    3. Re: psychodrama conferences (Edward Schreiber)
>    4. Re: ASGPP Conference (Adam Blatner)
>    5. Re: ASGPP Conference (Edward Schreiber)
>    6. Re: ASGPP Conference (Adam Blatner)
>    7. Re: ASGPP Conference (Edward Schreiber)
>    8. Psychodrama Bibliography - New Home (T.Treadwell)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:27:00 -0500
> From: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>
> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
> To: "Edward Schreiber" <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>,
> 	<list at grouptalkweb.org>
> Message-ID: <004a01c78b55$252e49a0$2e01a8c0 at desktop>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> 	reply-type=response
>
> sounds good. Would it be helpful to articulate the concerns or issues,
> edited, condensed,
> re what the two subgroups were seeking to achieve? This might help  
> many of
> us identify our
> own hardly-realized concerns, functioning, as it were, as a kind of
> doubling.
>        Warmly, adam
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Edward Schreiber" <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
> To: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>; <list at grouptalkweb.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 11:23 AM
> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
>
>
>> Hi Adam,
>> To respond:
>> There were 2 (at least) subgroups w/in the organization.
>> They "came to a head" at the meeting.  There was a great
>> deal of work done before the meeting on Sunday.  Nick, Ed,
>> Council members, Rebecca, Louise, Nina, Natalie, Dale all
>> reached out to address their concerns and feelings.  When the
>> two sub-groups came together in an encounter, peace was found.
>> Moreno's encounter enacted in-situ in the group process.
>>
>> Mike Traynor was particularly helpful in standing as a bridge between
>> the two groups.  Ed Garcia and Nick held their presence well, with
>> dignity.  Passion emerged.  Energy.  Care.  Honesty.  A mix took  
>> place.
>> For me, for example, I had contact/encounter with those with whom  
>> I had
>> not before.  It was our method in action.
>>
>> John Rasberry, our new President summarized it at the end by  
>> addressing
>> a part of a letter to the Society from Zerka Moreno.  John noted,   
>> from
> her
>> letter, the need to sit down together like at a table.
>>
>> John presented, in masterful form, the spirit of inclusion.
>>
>> Ed
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Adam Blatner wrote:
>>
>>> Good news. I'm wondering if there were any specifics that we  
>>> should  know
>>> about sooner than the PNN, or perhaps more specifically,   
>>> re: ..."altered
> the
>>> sociometry that was stuck."    maybe or maybe not we'd be helped by
> knowing
>>> what was altered...
>>>
>>>    2. and more about: ... >  ASGPP Council reached to members  
>>> and  held
> one
>>> another to a standard, in
>>>> public and in private  --   what standard?
>>>      Well, maybe nothing more needs to be said, or maybe something.
>>>
>>>    Thanks again Ed and rosalie and all..   warmly, adam
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Edward Schreiber" <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
>>> To: <list at grouptalkweb.org>
>>> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 5:57 AM
>>> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
>>>
>>>
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> Thanks to the conference committee for the most outstanding
>>>> example of finding our way to peace together.  What an rich
>>>> conference, warm, professional, honest, caring.  For those unable
>>>> to attend Amy Goodman as keynote speaker brought us into the
>>>> world fabric, asking us to address who shall survive.  The  
>>>> workshops
>>>> were rich, deep and broad.  That setting elegant, supportive and
>>>> loving.  The work we did as a society set the course for the next 2
>>>> years with a clearly defined agenda for where we must go (less
> expensive
>>>> conferences and continued inclusion - and respect for our
>>>> differences) and
>>>> brought us closer to realizing our true work:  all of humankind.
>>>> The ASGPP
>>>> annual meeting on Sunday morning brought us toward one another, as
>>>> difficult as that was, and altered the sociometry that was stuck.
>>>>
>>>> Louise and Roberto as co-chairs were just wonderful as hosts and  
>>>> the
>>>> ASGPP
>>>> Council reached to members and held one another to a standard, in
>>>> public and in
>>>> private I am sure.
>>>>
>>>> For me, I went to the Conference uncertain about the future for our
>>>> organization.
>>>> I left feeling sure that we are on the path to realizing the  
>>>> dream of
>>>> Dr. Moreno and
>>>> Zerka Moreno:  to created "democratic creatocracy".   Thank you  
>>>> ASGPP
>>>> and thank
>>>> you Conference Co-Chairs and Conference Committee for holding that
>>>> vision and
>>>> putting it into action.
>>>>
>>>> Ed Schreiber
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Grouptalk mailing list
>>>> List at grouptalkweb.org
>>>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Grouptalk mailing list
>>> List at grouptalkweb.org
>>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database:
> 269.6.2/781 - Release
>> Date: 4/30/2007 9:14 AM
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:27:24 -0400
> From: Edward Schreiber <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
> To: Adam Blatner <adam at blatner.com>, list at grouptalkweb.org
> Message-ID: <4492EE0C-EF8A-4DA3-AA2D-3C221D585C15 at earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
> Hi Adam,
> I endorse the open society standard, I think one great advance in our
> work
> was offered by Mike Traynor during the meeting.  He suggested that we
> use the ASGPP membership forum to engage in a full discussion,  
> ongoing,
> overtime of the issues of moving forward.  The issues generated
> during the
> ASGPP Sunday meeting were about moving forward and the particular
> concerns
> and dynamics that needed attention.  So I support Mike's leadership
> and want
> to do some chatting on the ASGPP members board.
>
> On that note, I am unsure of how to post a new topic on the site.
>
> Does anyone know how to do that?  I tried but could not.
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> On Apr 30, 2007, at 2:27 PM, Adam Blatner wrote:
>
>> sounds good. Would it be helpful to articulate the concerns or
>> issues, edited, condensed, re what the two subgroups were seeking
>> to achieve? This might help many of us identify our own hardly-
>> realized concerns, functioning, as it were, as a kind of doubling.
>>       Warmly, adam
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edward Schreiber"
>> <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
>> To: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>; <list at grouptalkweb.org>
>> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 11:23 AM
>> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
>>
>>
>>> Hi Adam,
>>> To respond:
>>> There were 2 (at least) subgroups w/in the organization.
>>> They "came to a head" at the meeting.  There was a great
>>> deal of work done before the meeting on Sunday.  Nick, Ed,
>>> Council members, Rebecca, Louise, Nina, Natalie, Dale all
>>> reached out to address their concerns and feelings.  When the
>>> two sub-groups came together in an encounter, peace was found.
>>> Moreno's encounter enacted in-situ in the group process.
>>>
>>> Mike Traynor was particularly helpful in standing as a bridge  
>>> between
>>> the two groups.  Ed Garcia and Nick held their presence well, with
>>> dignity.  Passion emerged.  Energy.  Care.  Honesty.  A mix took
>>> place.
>>> For me, for example, I had contact/encounter with those with whom
>>> I had
>>> not before.  It was our method in action.
>>>
>>> John Rasberry, our new President summarized it at the end by
>>> addressing
>>> a part of a letter to the Society from Zerka Moreno.  John noted,
>>> from her
>>> letter, the need to sit down together like at a table.
>>>
>>> John presented, in masterful form, the spirit of inclusion.
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Adam Blatner wrote:
>>>
>>>> Good news. I'm wondering if there were any specifics that we
>>>> should  know
>>>> about sooner than the PNN, or perhaps more specifically,
>>>> re: ..."altered the
>>>> sociometry that was stuck."    maybe or maybe not we'd be helped
>>>> by  knowing
>>>> what was altered...
>>>>
>>>>    2. and more about: ... >  ASGPP Council reached to members
>>>> and  held one
>>>> another to a standard, in
>>>>> public and in private  --   what standard?
>>>>      Well, maybe nothing more needs to be said, or maybe something.
>>>>
>>>>    Thanks again Ed and rosalie and all..   warmly, adam
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Edward Schreiber" <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
>>>> To: <list at grouptalkweb.org>
>>>> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 5:57 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>> Thanks to the conference committee for the most outstanding
>>>>> example of finding our way to peace together.  What an rich
>>>>> conference, warm, professional, honest, caring.  For those unable
>>>>> to attend Amy Goodman as keynote speaker brought us into the
>>>>> world fabric, asking us to address who shall survive.  The
>>>>> workshops
>>>>> were rich, deep and broad.  That setting elegant, supportive and
>>>>> loving.  The work we did as a society set the course for the  
>>>>> next 2
>>>>> years with a clearly defined agenda for where we must go (less
>>>>> expensive
>>>>> conferences and continued inclusion - and respect for our
>>>>> differences) and
>>>>> brought us closer to realizing our true work:  all of humankind.
>>>>> The ASGPP
>>>>> annual meeting on Sunday morning brought us toward one another, as
>>>>> difficult as that was, and altered the sociometry that was stuck.
>>>>>
>>>>> Louise and Roberto as co-chairs were just wonderful as hosts and
>>>>> the
>>>>> ASGPP
>>>>> Council reached to members and held one another to a standard, in
>>>>> public and in
>>>>> private I am sure.
>>>>>
>>>>> For me, I went to the Conference uncertain about the future for  
>>>>> our
>>>>> organization.
>>>>> I left feeling sure that we are on the path to realizing the
>>>>> dream of
>>>>> Dr. Moreno and
>>>>> Zerka Moreno:  to created "democratic creatocracy".   Thank you
>>>>> ASGPP
>>>>> and thank
>>>>> you Conference Co-Chairs and Conference Committee for holding that
>>>>> vision and
>>>>> putting it into action.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ed Schreiber
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Grouptalk mailing list
>>>>> List at grouptalkweb.org
>>>>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Grouptalk mailing list
>>>> List at grouptalkweb.org
>>>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database:
>>> 269.6.2/781 - Release Date: 4/30/2007 9:14 AM
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:41:13 -0400
> From: Edward Schreiber <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: psychodrama conferences
> To: list at grouptalkweb.org
> Message-ID: <E56E9C99-4872-4C9C-A4C3-4F62A0D924C4 at earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Karen,
> I missed you at the conference!
> Ed
> On Apr 26, 2007, at 8:43 AM, Karen Carnabucci wrote:
>
>> See query below, about interest in psychodrama confererences and
>> events in Texas.
>> Karen Carnabucci, MSS, LCSW, TEP
>> Companions In Healing
>>
>> Lake House Health &  Learning Center
>> 932 Lake Ave.
>> Racine, WI 53403
>>
>> (262) 633-2645
>> karen at companionsinhealing.com
>>
>> www.lakehousecenter.com
>> www.companionsinhealing.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Masih, Victoria S. [mailto:Victoria.Masih at va.gov]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 10:00 AM
>> To: Karen Carnabucci
>> Subject: psychodrama conferences
>>
>>  Dear Karen, I am interested in learning about psychodrama. I think
>> it will be a tremendous asset for me in working with veterans in
>> dealing with their PTSD issues.  I am currently living in Temple,
>> Texas which is close to Dallas and Austin and San Antonio. Do you
>> know of any conferences in the vicinity this summer that I may be
>> able to go to? By the way I graduated from University of Wisconsin
>> at Parkside several years ago.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Victoria Masih, LCSW
>>
>> Grouptalk mailing list
>> List at grouptalkweb.org
>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> /pipermail/list_grouptalkweb.org/attachments/20070430/bfe63e95/ 
> attachment-00
> 01.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:32:08 -0500
> From: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>
> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
> To: "Edward Schreiber" <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
> Cc: list at grouptalkweb.org
> Message-ID: <001f01c78b77$63818470$2e01a8c0 at desktop>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> 	reply-type=response
>
> Dear Ed,
>    Actually, there have been a few emails out from Nick Wolff over  
> the last
> year about the
> forum. I spoke with Mike Traynor about the Forum and noted that  
> it's hard to
> get on and
> very few people seemed to use it---that's why I prefer Grouptalk. I  
> said
> that if I knew
> there were some folks reading and contributing, I might put up with  
> the
> hassle and use
> that format, but so far when I've checked it, so little has been  
> posted.
>          I wonder how many others want to use that medium. I'd play if
> others would, too.
>
>       You might ask Mike to re-submit the instructions yet again,  
> because
> I've found that
> one must be persistent in informing a social group about an  
> upcoming event
> or new
> resource, reminding everyone at least three times, and then  
> repeating the
> announcement
> every 6 months or so.
>
>        Warmly, adam
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Edward Schreiber" <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
> To: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>; <list at grouptalkweb.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 3:27 PM
> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
>
>
>> Hi Adam,
>> I endorse the open society standard, I think one great advance in our
> work
>> was offered by Mike Traynor during the meeting.  He suggested that we
>> use the ASGPP membership forum to engage in a full discussion,  
>> ongoing,
>> overtime of the issues of moving forward.  The issues generated   
>> during
> the
>> ASGPP Sunday meeting were about moving forward and the particular
> concerns
>> and dynamics that needed attention.  So I support Mike's  
>> leadership  and
> want
>> to do some chatting on the ASGPP members board.
>>
>> On that note, I am unsure of how to post a new topic on the site.
>>
>> Does anyone know how to do that?  I tried but could not.
>>
>> Ed
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 30, 2007, at 2:27 PM, Adam Blatner wrote:
>>
>>> sounds good. Would it be helpful to articulate the concerns or   
>>> issues,
> edited,
>>> condensed, re what the two subgroups were seeking  to achieve?  
>>> This might
> help many of
>>> us identify our own hardly- realized concerns, functioning, as it  
>>> were,
> as a kind of
>>> doubling.
>>>       Warmly, adam
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edward Schreiber"
> <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
>>> To: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>; <list at grouptalkweb.org>
>>> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 11:23 AM
>>> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Adam,
>>>> To respond:
>>>> There were 2 (at least) subgroups w/in the organization.
>>>> They "came to a head" at the meeting.  There was a great
>>>> deal of work done before the meeting on Sunday.  Nick, Ed,
>>>> Council members, Rebecca, Louise, Nina, Natalie, Dale all
>>>> reached out to address their concerns and feelings.  When the
>>>> two sub-groups came together in an encounter, peace was found.
>>>> Moreno's encounter enacted in-situ in the group process.
>>>>
>>>> Mike Traynor was particularly helpful in standing as a bridge  
>>>> between
>>>> the two groups.  Ed Garcia and Nick held their presence well, with
>>>> dignity.  Passion emerged.  Energy.  Care.  Honesty.  A mix  
>>>> took  place.
>>>> For me, for example, I had contact/encounter with those with  
>>>> whom  I had
>>>> not before.  It was our method in action.
>>>>
>>>> John Rasberry, our new President summarized it at the end by   
>>>> addressing
>>>> a part of a letter to the Society from Zerka Moreno.  John  
>>>> noted,   from
> her
>>>> letter, the need to sit down together like at a table.
>>>>
>>>> John presented, in masterful form, the spirit of inclusion.
>>>>
>>>> Ed
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Adam Blatner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Good news. I'm wondering if there were any specifics that we   
>>>>> should
> know
>>>>> about sooner than the PNN, or perhaps more specifically,   re:
> ..."altered the
>>>>> sociometry that was stuck."    maybe or maybe not we'd be  
>>>>> helped  by
> knowing
>>>>> what was altered...
>>>>>
>>>>>    2. and more about: ... >  ASGPP Council reached to members  and
> held one
>>>>> another to a standard, in
>>>>>> public and in private  --   what standard?
>>>>>      Well, maybe nothing more needs to be said, or maybe  
>>>>> something.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Thanks again Ed and rosalie and all..   warmly, adam
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Edward Schreiber" <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
>>>>> To: <list at grouptalkweb.org>
>>>>> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 5:57 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>> Thanks to the conference committee for the most outstanding
>>>>>> example of finding our way to peace together.  What an rich
>>>>>> conference, warm, professional, honest, caring.  For those unable
>>>>>> to attend Amy Goodman as keynote speaker brought us into the
>>>>>> world fabric, asking us to address who shall survive.  The   
>>>>>> workshops
>>>>>> were rich, deep and broad.  That setting elegant, supportive and
>>>>>> loving.  The work we did as a society set the course for the  
>>>>>> next 2
>>>>>> years with a clearly defined agenda for where we must go (less
> expensive
>>>>>> conferences and continued inclusion - and respect for our
>>>>>> differences) and
>>>>>> brought us closer to realizing our true work:  all of humankind.
>>>>>> The ASGPP
>>>>>> annual meeting on Sunday morning brought us toward one  
>>>>>> another, as
>>>>>> difficult as that was, and altered the sociometry that was stuck.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Louise and Roberto as co-chairs were just wonderful as hosts  
>>>>>> and  the
>>>>>> ASGPP
>>>>>> Council reached to members and held one another to a standard, in
>>>>>> public and in
>>>>>> private I am sure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For me, I went to the Conference uncertain about the future  
>>>>>> for our
>>>>>> organization.
>>>>>> I left feeling sure that we are on the path to realizing the   
>>>>>> dream of
>>>>>> Dr. Moreno and
>>>>>> Zerka Moreno:  to created "democratic creatocracy".   Thank  
>>>>>> you  ASGPP
>>>>>> and thank
>>>>>> you Conference Co-Chairs and Conference Committee for holding  
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> vision and
>>>>>> putting it into action.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ed Schreiber
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Grouptalk mailing list
>>>>>> List at grouptalkweb.org
>>>>>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Grouptalk mailing list
>>>>> List at grouptalkweb.org
>>>>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database:
> 269.6.2/781 - Release
>>>> Date: 4/30/2007 9:14 AM
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database:
> 269.6.2/781 - Release
>> Date: 4/30/2007 9:14 AM
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:47:48 -0400
> From: Edward Schreiber <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
> To: Adam Blatner <adam at blatner.com>, list at grouptalkweb.org
> Message-ID: <49070A3E-A407-456E-B9E4-FB0DCD9F8711 at earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
> Dear Adam,
> Yes, I feel the same about Grouptalk!  It is so damn easy to use.
> But for ongoing long term discussions, the ASGPP is asking us to use
> the site's discussion board.  So I want to support that request and
> think
> it makes a lot of sense!
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> On Apr 30, 2007, at 6:32 PM, Adam Blatner wrote:
>
>> Dear Ed,
>>   Actually, there have been a few emails out from Nick Wolff over
>> the last year about the forum. I spoke with Mike Traynor about the
>> Forum and noted that it's hard to get on and very few people seemed
>> to use it---that's why I prefer Grouptalk. I said that if I knew
>> there were some folks reading and contributing, I might put up with
>> the hassle and use that format, but so far when I've checked it, so
>> little has been posted.
>>         I wonder how many others want to use that medium. I'd play
>> if others would, too.
>>
>>      You might ask Mike to re-submit the instructions yet again,
>> because I've found that one must be persistent in informing a
>> social group about an upcoming event or new resource, reminding
>> everyone at least three times, and then repeating the announcement
>> every 6 months or so.
>>
>>       Warmly, adam
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edward Schreiber"
>> <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
>> To: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>; <list at grouptalkweb.org>
>> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 3:27 PM
>> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
>>
>>
>>> Hi Adam,
>>> I endorse the open society standard, I think one great advance in
>>> our  work
>>> was offered by Mike Traynor during the meeting.  He suggested  
>>> that we
>>> use the ASGPP membership forum to engage in a full discussion,
>>> ongoing,
>>> overtime of the issues of moving forward.  The issues generated
>>> during the
>>> ASGPP Sunday meeting were about moving forward and the particular
>>> concerns
>>> and dynamics that needed attention.  So I support Mike's
>>> leadership  and want
>>> to do some chatting on the ASGPP members board.
>>>
>>> On that note, I am unsure of how to post a new topic on the site.
>>>
>>> Does anyone know how to do that?  I tried but could not.
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 30, 2007, at 2:27 PM, Adam Blatner wrote:
>>>
>>>> sounds good. Would it be helpful to articulate the concerns or
>>>> issues, edited, condensed, re what the two subgroups were
>>>> seeking  to achieve? This might help many of us identify our own
>>>> hardly- realized concerns, functioning, as it were, as a kind of
>>>> doubling.
>>>>       Warmly, adam
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edward Schreiber"
>>>> <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
>>>> To: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>; <list at grouptalkweb.org>
>>>> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 11:23 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Adam,
>>>>> To respond:
>>>>> There were 2 (at least) subgroups w/in the organization.
>>>>> They "came to a head" at the meeting.  There was a great
>>>>> deal of work done before the meeting on Sunday.  Nick, Ed,
>>>>> Council members, Rebecca, Louise, Nina, Natalie, Dale all
>>>>> reached out to address their concerns and feelings.  When the
>>>>> two sub-groups came together in an encounter, peace was found.
>>>>> Moreno's encounter enacted in-situ in the group process.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike Traynor was particularly helpful in standing as a bridge
>>>>> between
>>>>> the two groups.  Ed Garcia and Nick held their presence well, with
>>>>> dignity.  Passion emerged.  Energy.  Care.  Honesty.  A mix
>>>>> took  place.
>>>>> For me, for example, I had contact/encounter with those with
>>>>> whom  I had
>>>>> not before.  It was our method in action.
>>>>>
>>>>> John Rasberry, our new President summarized it at the end by
>>>>> addressing
>>>>> a part of a letter to the Society from Zerka Moreno.  John
>>>>> noted,   from her
>>>>> letter, the need to sit down together like at a table.
>>>>>
>>>>> John presented, in masterful form, the spirit of inclusion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ed
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Adam Blatner wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Good news. I'm wondering if there were any specifics that we
>>>>>> should  know
>>>>>> about sooner than the PNN, or perhaps more specifically,
>>>>>> re: ..."altered the
>>>>>> sociometry that was stuck."    maybe or maybe not we'd be
>>>>>> helped  by  knowing
>>>>>> what was altered...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    2. and more about: ... >  ASGPP Council reached to members
>>>>>> and  held one
>>>>>> another to a standard, in
>>>>>>> public and in private  --   what standard?
>>>>>>      Well, maybe nothing more needs to be said, or maybe
>>>>>> something.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Thanks again Ed and rosalie and all..   warmly, adam
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Edward Schreiber" <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
>>>>>> To: <list at grouptalkweb.org>
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 5:57 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>>> Thanks to the conference committee for the most outstanding
>>>>>>> example of finding our way to peace together.  What an rich
>>>>>>> conference, warm, professional, honest, caring.  For those  
>>>>>>> unable
>>>>>>> to attend Amy Goodman as keynote speaker brought us into the
>>>>>>> world fabric, asking us to address who shall survive.  The
>>>>>>> workshops
>>>>>>> were rich, deep and broad.  That setting elegant, supportive and
>>>>>>> loving.  The work we did as a society set the course for the
>>>>>>> next 2
>>>>>>> years with a clearly defined agenda for where we must go
>>>>>>> (less   expensive
>>>>>>> conferences and continued inclusion - and respect for our
>>>>>>> differences) and
>>>>>>> brought us closer to realizing our true work:  all of humankind.
>>>>>>> The ASGPP
>>>>>>> annual meeting on Sunday morning brought us toward one
>>>>>>> another, as
>>>>>>> difficult as that was, and altered the sociometry that was  
>>>>>>> stuck.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Louise and Roberto as co-chairs were just wonderful as hosts
>>>>>>> and  the
>>>>>>> ASGPP
>>>>>>> Council reached to members and held one another to a  
>>>>>>> standard, in
>>>>>>> public and in
>>>>>>> private I am sure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For me, I went to the Conference uncertain about the future
>>>>>>> for our
>>>>>>> organization.
>>>>>>> I left feeling sure that we are on the path to realizing the
>>>>>>> dream of
>>>>>>> Dr. Moreno and
>>>>>>> Zerka Moreno:  to created "democratic creatocracy".   Thank
>>>>>>> you  ASGPP
>>>>>>> and thank
>>>>>>> you Conference Co-Chairs and Conference Committee for holding
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> vision and
>>>>>>> putting it into action.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ed Schreiber
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Grouptalk mailing list
>>>>>>> List at grouptalkweb.org
>>>>>>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Grouptalk mailing list
>>>>>> List at grouptalkweb.org
>>>>>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database:
>>>>> 269.6.2/781 - Release Date: 4/30/2007 9:14 AM
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database:
>>> 269.6.2/781 - Release Date: 4/30/2007 9:14 AM
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:59:52 -0500
> From: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>
> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
> To: "Edward Schreiber" <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
> Cc: Midsouthcenter at aol.com, list at grouptalkweb.org,	Suzie Jary
> 	<sjary at mindspring.com>
> Message-ID: <01a001c78b7b$43eecbf0$2f01a8c0 at ablatner>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> 	reply-type=response
>
> Well, if they want us to use the forum, they should make it easy.  
> Put out
> the announcements on how to use it. Put them out again. Recruit  
> five people
> who will post an issue from the executive committee. Request  
> responses. Have
>
> messages from the president.
>     Have each person on the exec committee introduce him/herself  
> and what
> s/he wants to talk about, do, and get feedback about. What  
> subcommittee
> responsibilities do they take on.
>      See if you can recruit five people with whom you've had good  
> tele to
> join you in this project. Better, ten or fifteen.
>   Do we know who the exec council is, their old and new subcommittee
> assignments, if any have changed; their email addresses? That would  
> be good.
>
> Sue Barnum is moving or has moved to New Mexico. A loss for Texas.  
> Has she
> changed her email addrress yet?
>
>     Have Mike Traynor and our new president and others get involved in
> promoting involvements.
>
>     Then let's see how much momentum it gains, or if it peters out.
>
>         What do you think about that?
>                  Warmly, Adam
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Edward Schreiber" <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
> To: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>; <list at grouptalkweb.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 5:47 PM
> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
>
>
>> Dear Adam,
>> Yes, I feel the same about Grouptalk!  It is so damn easy to use.
>> But for ongoing long term discussions, the ASGPP is asking us to use
>> the site's discussion board.  So I want to support that request  
>> and  think
>> it makes a lot of sense!
>>
>> Ed
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 30, 2007, at 6:32 PM, Adam Blatner wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Ed,
>>>   Actually, there have been a few emails out from Nick Wolff  
>>> over  the
>>> last year about the forum. I spoke with Mike Traynor about the   
>>> Forum and
>
>>> noted that it's hard to get on and very few people seemed  to use
>>> it---that's why I prefer Grouptalk. I said that if I knew  there  
>>> were
>>> some folks reading and contributing, I might put up with  the  
>>> hassle and
>>> use that format, but so far when I've checked it, so  little has  
>>> been
>>> posted.
>>>         I wonder how many others want to use that medium. I'd  
>>> play  if
>>> others would, too.
>>>
>>>      You might ask Mike to re-submit the instructions yet again,   
>>> because
>
>>> I've found that one must be persistent in informing a  social  
>>> group about
>
>>> an upcoming event or new resource, reminding  everyone at least  
>>> three
>>> times, and then repeating the announcement  every 6 months or so.
>>>
>>>       Warmly, adam
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edward Schreiber"
>>> <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
>>> To: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>; <list at grouptalkweb.org>
>>> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 3:27 PM
>>> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Adam,
>>>> I endorse the open society standard, I think one great advance  
>>>> in  our
>>>> work
>>>> was offered by Mike Traynor during the meeting.  He suggested  
>>>> that we
>>>> use the ASGPP membership forum to engage in a full discussion,   
>>>> ongoing,
>>>> overtime of the issues of moving forward.  The issues  
>>>> generated   during
>
>>>> the
>>>> ASGPP Sunday meeting were about moving forward and the particular
>>>> concerns
>>>> and dynamics that needed attention.  So I support Mike's   
>>>> leadership
>>>> and want
>>>> to do some chatting on the ASGPP members board.
>>>>
>>>> On that note, I am unsure of how to post a new topic on the site.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone know how to do that?  I tried but could not.
>>>>
>>>> Ed
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 30, 2007, at 2:27 PM, Adam Blatner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> sounds good. Would it be helpful to articulate the concerns or
>>>>> issues, edited, condensed, re what the two subgroups were   
>>>>> seeking  to
>>>>> achieve? This might help many of us identify our own  hardly-  
>>>>> realized
>>>>> concerns, functioning, as it were, as a kind of  doubling.
>>>>>       Warmly, adam
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edward Schreiber"
>>>>> <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
>>>>> To: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>; <list at grouptalkweb.org>
>>>>> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 11:23 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Adam,
>>>>>> To respond:
>>>>>> There were 2 (at least) subgroups w/in the organization.
>>>>>> They "came to a head" at the meeting.  There was a great
>>>>>> deal of work done before the meeting on Sunday.  Nick, Ed,
>>>>>> Council members, Rebecca, Louise, Nina, Natalie, Dale all
>>>>>> reached out to address their concerns and feelings.  When the
>>>>>> two sub-groups came together in an encounter, peace was found.
>>>>>> Moreno's encounter enacted in-situ in the group process.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike Traynor was particularly helpful in standing as a bridge   
>>>>>> between
>>>>>> the two groups.  Ed Garcia and Nick held their presence well,  
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> dignity.  Passion emerged.  Energy.  Care.  Honesty.  A mix  took
>>>>>> place.
>>>>>> For me, for example, I had contact/encounter with those with   
>>>>>> whom  I
>>>>>> had
>>>>>> not before.  It was our method in action.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John Rasberry, our new President summarized it at the end by
>>>>>> addressing
>>>>>> a part of a letter to the Society from Zerka Moreno.  John   
>>>>>> noted,
>>>>>> from her
>>>>>> letter, the need to sit down together like at a table.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John presented, in masterful form, the spirit of inclusion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ed
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Adam Blatner wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good news. I'm wondering if there were any specifics that  
>>>>>>> we   should
>
>>>>>>> know
>>>>>>> about sooner than the PNN, or perhaps more specifically,    re:
>>>>>>> ..."altered the
>>>>>>> sociometry that was stuck."    maybe or maybe not we'd be   
>>>>>>> helped  by
>
>>>>>>> knowing
>>>>>>> what was altered...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    2. and more about: ... >  ASGPP Council reached to  
>>>>>>> members   and
>>>>>>> held one
>>>>>>> another to a standard, in
>>>>>>>> public and in private  --   what standard?
>>>>>>>      Well, maybe nothing more needs to be said, or maybe   
>>>>>>> something.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    Thanks again Ed and rosalie and all..   warmly, adam
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: "Edward Schreiber" <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
>>>>>>> To: <list at grouptalkweb.org>
>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 5:57 AM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>>>> Thanks to the conference committee for the most outstanding
>>>>>>>> example of finding our way to peace together.  What an rich
>>>>>>>> conference, warm, professional, honest, caring.  For those  
>>>>>>>> unable
>>>>>>>> to attend Amy Goodman as keynote speaker brought us into the
>>>>>>>> world fabric, asking us to address who shall survive.  The
>>>>>>>> workshops
>>>>>>>> were rich, deep and broad.  That setting elegant, supportive  
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> loving.  The work we did as a society set the course for  
>>>>>>>> the  next 2
>>>>>>>> years with a clearly defined agenda for where we must go  (less
>>>>>>>> expensive
>>>>>>>> conferences and continued inclusion - and respect for our
>>>>>>>> differences) and
>>>>>>>> brought us closer to realizing our true work:  all of  
>>>>>>>> humankind.
>>>>>>>> The ASGPP
>>>>>>>> annual meeting on Sunday morning brought us toward one   
>>>>>>>> another, as
>>>>>>>> difficult as that was, and altered the sociometry that was  
>>>>>>>> stuck.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Louise and Roberto as co-chairs were just wonderful as  
>>>>>>>> hosts  and
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> ASGPP
>>>>>>>> Council reached to members and held one another to a  
>>>>>>>> standard, in
>>>>>>>> public and in
>>>>>>>> private I am sure.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For me, I went to the Conference uncertain about the future   
>>>>>>>> for our
>>>>>>>> organization.
>>>>>>>> I left feeling sure that we are on the path to realizing  
>>>>>>>> the   dream
>
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> Dr. Moreno and
>>>>>>>> Zerka Moreno:  to created "democratic creatocracy".   Thank   
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> ASGPP
>>>>>>>> and thank
>>>>>>>> you Conference Co-Chairs and Conference Committee for  
>>>>>>>> holding  that
>>>>>>>> vision and
>>>>>>>> putting it into action.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ed Schreiber
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Grouptalk mailing list
>>>>>>>> List at grouptalkweb.org
>>>>>>>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Grouptalk mailing list
>>>>>>> List at grouptalkweb.org
>>>>>>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database:
>>>>>> 269.6.2/781 - Release Date: 4/30/2007 9:14 AM
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database:
>>>> 269.6.2/781 - Release Date: 4/30/2007 9:14 AM
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:08:31 -0400
> From: Edward Schreiber <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
> To: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>
> Cc: list at grouptalkweb.org
> Message-ID: <75CF72DE-4010-46A3-9B74-6279D7905BC4 at earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
> I think the direction, intent, motion and emotion of the council is
> clearly to move the ASGPP forward.
> I feel really good about all the conversations I had, with Ed G, with
> John R, with Mike and others.  It
> is time to gather around and lend a hand, in my opinion.  At least
> that's my  intent!
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> On Apr 30, 2007, at 6:59 PM, Adam Blatner wrote:
>
>> Well, if they want us to use the forum, they should make it easy.
>> Put out the announcements on how to use it. Put them out again.
>> Recruit five people who will post an issue from the executive
>> committee. Request responses. Have messages from the president.
>>    Have each person on the exec committee introduce him/herself and
>> what s/he wants to talk about, do, and get feedback about. What
>> subcommittee responsibilities do they take on.
>>     See if you can recruit five people with whom you've had good
>> tele to join you in this project. Better, ten or fifteen.
>>  Do we know who the exec council is, their old and new subcommittee
>> assignments, if any have changed; their email addresses? That would
>> be good. Sue Barnum is moving or has moved to New Mexico. A loss
>> for Texas. Has she changed her email addrress yet?
>>
>>    Have Mike Traynor and our new president and others get involved
>> in promoting involvements.
>>
>>    Then let's see how much momentum it gains, or if it peters out.
>>
>>        What do you think about that?
>>                 Warmly, Adam
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edward Schreiber"
>> <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
>> To: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>; <list at grouptalkweb.org>
>> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 5:47 PM
>> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
>>
>>
>>> Dear Adam,
>>> Yes, I feel the same about Grouptalk!  It is so damn easy to use.
>>> But for ongoing long term discussions, the ASGPP is asking us to use
>>> the site's discussion board.  So I want to support that request
>>> and  think
>>> it makes a lot of sense!
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 30, 2007, at 6:32 PM, Adam Blatner wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Ed,
>>>>   Actually, there have been a few emails out from Nick Wolff
>>>> over  the last year about the forum. I spoke with Mike Traynor
>>>> about the  Forum and noted that it's hard to get on and very few
>>>> people seemed  to use it---that's why I prefer Grouptalk. I said
>>>> that if I knew  there were some folks reading and contributing, I
>>>> might put up with  the hassle and use that format, but so far
>>>> when I've checked it, so  little has been posted.
>>>>         I wonder how many others want to use that medium. I'd
>>>> play  if others would, too.
>>>>
>>>>      You might ask Mike to re-submit the instructions yet again,
>>>> because I've found that one must be persistent in informing a
>>>> social group about an upcoming event or new resource, reminding
>>>> everyone at least three times, and then repeating the
>>>> announcement  every 6 months or so.
>>>>
>>>>       Warmly, adam
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edward Schreiber"
>>>> <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
>>>> To: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>; <list at grouptalkweb.org>
>>>> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 3:27 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Adam,
>>>>> I endorse the open society standard, I think one great advance
>>>>> in  our work
>>>>> was offered by Mike Traynor during the meeting.  He suggested
>>>>> that we
>>>>> use the ASGPP membership forum to engage in a full discussion,
>>>>> ongoing,
>>>>> overtime of the issues of moving forward.  The issues
>>>>> generated   during the
>>>>> ASGPP Sunday meeting were about moving forward and the
>>>>> particular concerns
>>>>> and dynamics that needed attention.  So I support Mike's
>>>>> leadership and want
>>>>> to do some chatting on the ASGPP members board.
>>>>>
>>>>> On that note, I am unsure of how to post a new topic on the site.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone know how to do that?  I tried but could not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ed
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 30, 2007, at 2:27 PM, Adam Blatner wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> sounds good. Would it be helpful to articulate the concerns or
>>>>>> issues, edited, condensed, re what the two subgroups were
>>>>>> seeking  to achieve? This might help many of us identify our
>>>>>> own  hardly- realized concerns, functioning, as it were, as a
>>>>>> kind of  doubling.
>>>>>>       Warmly, adam
>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edward Schreiber"
>>>>>> <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
>>>>>> To: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>; <list at grouptalkweb.org>
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 11:23 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Adam,
>>>>>>> To respond:
>>>>>>> There were 2 (at least) subgroups w/in the organization.
>>>>>>> They "came to a head" at the meeting.  There was a great
>>>>>>> deal of work done before the meeting on Sunday.  Nick, Ed,
>>>>>>> Council members, Rebecca, Louise, Nina, Natalie, Dale all
>>>>>>> reached out to address their concerns and feelings.  When the
>>>>>>> two sub-groups came together in an encounter, peace was found.
>>>>>>> Moreno's encounter enacted in-situ in the group process.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike Traynor was particularly helpful in standing as a bridge
>>>>>>> between
>>>>>>> the two groups.  Ed Garcia and Nick held their presence well,
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> dignity.  Passion emerged.  Energy.  Care.  Honesty.  A mix
>>>>>>> took place.
>>>>>>> For me, for example, I had contact/encounter with those with
>>>>>>> whom  I had
>>>>>>> not before.  It was our method in action.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John Rasberry, our new President summarized it at the end by
>>>>>>> addressing
>>>>>>> a part of a letter to the Society from Zerka Moreno.  John
>>>>>>> noted, from her
>>>>>>> letter, the need to sit down together like at a table.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John presented, in masterful form, the spirit of inclusion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ed
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Adam Blatner wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Good news. I'm wondering if there were any specifics that
>>>>>>>> we   should know
>>>>>>>> about sooner than the PNN, or perhaps more specifically,
>>>>>>>> re: ..."altered the
>>>>>>>> sociometry that was stuck."    maybe or maybe not we'd be
>>>>>>>> helped  by knowing
>>>>>>>> what was altered...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    2. and more about: ... >  ASGPP Council reached to
>>>>>>>> members   and held one
>>>>>>>> another to a standard, in
>>>>>>>>> public and in private  --   what standard?
>>>>>>>>      Well, maybe nothing more needs to be said, or maybe
>>>>>>>> something.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    Thanks again Ed and rosalie and all..   warmly, adam
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>> From: "Edward Schreiber" <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
>>>>>>>> To: <list at grouptalkweb.org>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 5:57 AM
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ASGPP Conference
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>>>>> Thanks to the conference committee for the most outstanding
>>>>>>>>> example of finding our way to peace together.  What an rich
>>>>>>>>> conference, warm, professional, honest, caring.  For those
>>>>>>>>> unable
>>>>>>>>> to attend Amy Goodman as keynote speaker brought us into the
>>>>>>>>> world fabric, asking us to address who shall survive.  The
>>>>>>>>> workshops
>>>>>>>>> were rich, deep and broad.  That setting elegant, supportive
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> loving.  The work we did as a society set the course for
>>>>>>>>> the  next 2
>>>>>>>>> years with a clearly defined agenda for where we must go
>>>>>>>>> (less expensive
>>>>>>>>> conferences and continued inclusion - and respect for our
>>>>>>>>> differences) and
>>>>>>>>> brought us closer to realizing our true work:  all of
>>>>>>>>> humankind.
>>>>>>>>> The ASGPP
>>>>>>>>> annual meeting on Sunday morning brought us toward one
>>>>>>>>> another, as
>>>>>>>>> difficult as that was, and altered the sociometry that was
>>>>>>>>> stuck.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Louise and Roberto as co-chairs were just wonderful as
>>>>>>>>> hosts  and the
>>>>>>>>> ASGPP
>>>>>>>>> Council reached to members and held one another to a
>>>>>>>>> standard, in
>>>>>>>>> public and in
>>>>>>>>> private I am sure.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For me, I went to the Conference uncertain about the future
>>>>>>>>> for our
>>>>>>>>> organization.
>>>>>>>>> I left feeling sure that we are on the path to realizing
>>>>>>>>> the   dream of
>>>>>>>>> Dr. Moreno and
>>>>>>>>> Zerka Moreno:  to created "democratic creatocracy".   Thank
>>>>>>>>> you ASGPP
>>>>>>>>> and thank
>>>>>>>>> you Conference Co-Chairs and Conference Committee for
>>>>>>>>> holding  that
>>>>>>>>> vision and
>>>>>>>>> putting it into action.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ed Schreiber
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Grouptalk mailing list
>>>>>>>>> List at grouptalkweb.org
>>>>>>>>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Grouptalk mailing list
>>>>>>>> List at grouptalkweb.org
>>>>>>>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus
>>>>>>> Database: 269.6.2/781 - Release Date: 4/30/2007 9:14 AM
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database:
>>>>> 269.6.2/781 - Release Date: 4/30/2007 9:14 AM
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:56:14 -0500 (CDT)
> From: "T.Treadwell" <ttreadwe at grouptalkweb.org>
> Subject: Psychodrama Bibliography - New Home
> To: list at grouptalkweb.org
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704301952430.30956 at earth.s3servers.com>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> Jim Sacks Psychodrama Bibliography has moved to a new residence.   
> You may
> access the bibliography at this address:  Please bookmark this  
> address.
>
> http://pdbib.org/
>
> The old address will be de-activiated shortly.
>
>
>
> Thomas Treadwell         CompSoc - GraphPlot                
> Computerized
> Dept. of Psychology             \ /                         Sociometry
> West Chester Univ.            __/ \__                   
> Phone-610-436-2723
> West Chester, Pa.    ttreadwe at grouptalkweb.org          
> FAX-610-436-2846
>                          Grouptalk Listserv
>                        http://grouptalkweb.org
>
>       A person will sometimes devote all his life to the  
> development of one
>       part of his body - the wishbone.  ~~Robert Frost
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Grouptalk mailing list
> List at grouptalkweb.org
> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>
>
>
> End of List Digest, Vol 11, Issue 1
> ***********************************
>
>
>
> Grouptalk mailing list
> List at grouptalkweb.org
> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org




More information about the List mailing list