economic squeezes
Adam Blatner
adam at blatner.com
Tue May 8 09:59:13 CDT 2007
Dear All,
Re economic stresses in our times: I would suggest that there is a state we might
call "hustling" that operates between prosperity and demoralization. In prosperity, there
is surplus time/energy to build the society, and the sub-societies. The decline of
civilizations comes with a general sense of economic and social decay, and I'm beginning
to think about that.
There are developed countries, and under-developed countries. I've heard about decay,
but haven't been faced with it. I heard about the Great Depression of the 1930s, but it
was over before the morale of the culture could drop.
Decay may be more gradual, involving a longer period of "squeezing" the middle
class. I think that's what is going on, more dramatically in Russia, perhaps, but also in
the USA. People are hustling, busy, feeling stressed, and every encouragement for giving a
bit---who has anything left over to give?
Trillions of dollars are being spent on armaments and the support systems,
salaries, oil, etc. for Iraq. Down the tubes. That money leaves everyone correspondingly
drained. No money left for this and that.
At work, equally tight. No money for psychiatric treatment, or at least, it's
rationed, so the treatment becomes hurried.
Management competence is measured in terms of how many corners you can cut and still
fool others and yourself that you haven't cut quality. but of course you have.
I think this mid-level of decay, hustling, can go on for years. People can still
think of themselves as reasonably prosperous, and the advertisers and media support this
image. Yet they aren't, they need to keep busier to keep up.
I think decay can lead to its own sub-type or component of demoralization, a
hardening, all rationalized. No time, no time. Those other things, hospitality,
reciprocity, answering emails... not important.
If decay continues, it leads to depression, demoralization, helplessness, giving
up. The boundaries may be fuzzy. Perhaps it leads more to desperateness and the
rationalization of immorality, crime, fudging the ethics.
In the hustling stage, there is also increased entitlement. Why can't I get some too?
If some get if free, why can't everything be free. It's my right. (what, after all , is a
"right" but a social agreement?)
(My son has been surprised at the emails he receives: He's developed programs
for teaching people how to get the most out of programs---in his field of desktop
publishing, he's considered a major figure, an expert. But people seem to
resent the not-excessive cost of his instructional programs. Most interesting.)
Indeed, my son read the above and wrote: I think you're quite right. There has been
a radical change in how we function. Most of my colleagues simply expect to work 2 or 3
people's jobs. Many people I know in management positions are now forced to fly economy
class at all times, including frequent trips to Asia, Europe, etc., then just sigh and say
what can be done, as the budgets have been slashed, even in economic boon. Everyone I know
is exhausted.
A friend of mine nearing 80 noted one of the most interesting changes over even the
past 30 or 40 years is that hardly anyone has time to read the newspaper anymore. He said
that even the most stressed out, overworked person would still have time to read the
paper. No longer. Too much hustle.
Hustling at 36,000 feet on my way to a conference in Chicago, David> Blatner
What might be your thoughts on this? -- Warmly, Adam
More information about the List
mailing list