Aristotele

[E L]

Ann
I was wondering if you would drop-in on that subject sometime. Aristotele! (
Ἀριστοτέλης ) I love it. (Smile.) No wonder so many people want to know you.


I would be interested in depersonalization as a subject especially as it may
contain either valuation or devaluation of a person based on their
sociometric status resulting, perhaps in a refusal in reciprocation and/or
in encounter.

Eric

*Inter-Personal Therapy and the Psychopathology of Inter-Personal Relations*
J. L. Moreno*, **Sociometry*, Vol. 1, No. 1/2 (Jul. - Oct., 1937), pp. 9-76

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 08:40:09 -0400
From: "Ann Hale" <annehale at swva.net>
Subject: aristotele
To: "grouptalk" <list at grouptalkweb.org>
Message-ID: <014e01c79d37$80350930$0301a8c0 at user8vk4fkzluw>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I wonder if we might have a discussion of aristotele here on
grouptalk.  Specifically, I am thinking of a discussion of sociometric
status which is ascribed to a person due to their connection, or apparent
connection to another person who has a higher or more stable sociometric
status.  I think the converse is also true. (Guilt by association, for
example)  Sociometric positions are rarely "fixed" and depend upon
reciprocity, group role repertoire, etc; however, there are some persons who
become fixed in their position until some event provides the opportunity for
persons to examine their sociometric choices on a new set of criteria.  What
I hope could come from a discussion like this is a clearer picture of
de-personalization which seems to be present in the aristotelic-based
connection.  Ann Hale


End of List Digest, Vol 11, Issue 39
************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/list_grouptalkweb.org/attachments/20070524/9e6f6273/attachment.html