related fields

[Edward Schreiber]

Adam,
I am interested to know, from your perspective and why, what on the  
list of American Board
'related fields' does not meet the criteria as a related field.

Any chance you would identify them, with the reasons you selected them?

Ed


On Nov 20, 2007, at 1:46 PM, Adam Blatner wrote:

> Dear Dale, thank you for taking the time to lay out the details on  
> the related fields
> question in the Board of Examiners' tests. It was a generous and  
> thoughtful effort.
>       I for one hope that this test does remain among those  
> included in the exam---I agree
> that it is useful.
>
>    Your noting that people can, in advance, ask to include a  
> specific related field and
> can create a rational argument for this request fits my thinking  
> that the explanation is
> part of the process. !  That might be the solution.
>
>       I like your listing of criteria, but might argue that several  
> things presently
> included on the list might not fit all those criteria.
>
>     Anyway, thanks again. Warmly, Adam
>
>
> Grouptalk mailing list
> List at grouptalkweb.org
> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org