certification exams

[Adam Blatner]

Dear People, I've sought feedback and want to say again that it might be interesting and helpful to identify specifically which items on recent exams are not adequately covered in the mainstream literature. I've written about updating a glossary, a project that might require the collaboration or at least input from at least five TEPs who might agree on a given definition. 
      I wonder if person A who trains with Trainer X gets the same information as person B training with Trainer Y.
                Well, Ed Schreiber's points are well taken, about process. (I did the same for specialty board exams.)
         Good wishes. 
    Warmly Adam
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Edward Schreiber 
  To: HV Psychodrama ; grouptalk Listserv 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 4:26 PM
  Subject: Re: To Future CPs and TEPs


  Oh yes, now I remember, our "national holi-day"


  Dear Soon to be TEPs and CPs,
  THe week before was like an altered state for me..
  Hyper-focus-trying to be relaxed.  Jeez, it was like the
  end of a marathon, and a marathon itself.


  The week before I did this cool thing:
  I tool the mass of notes and put them on 3/5 cares, summaries,
  then read them a few times (a card for methodology, a card for research,
  etc.) And then after reading those cards a few times, I reduced the cards
  to another version with just a few words to trigger my memory of the whole
  picture for each card.  It worked - and I thank Louise Lipman for teaching that.


  All in all it felt like a chance to say to the world:  this is me, this is what I know,
  this is what I have done and how I've done it  -  with gratitude and pride.


  Enjoy, good luck!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://grouptalkweb.org/pipermail/list_grouptalkweb.org/attachments/20071010/19491d3f/attachment.html