writing up papers
HV Psychodrama
hvpi at hvc.rr.com
Tue Oct 16 16:14:00 CDT 2007
One of the challenges I have in writing is trying to decide who my audience
is. Other psychodramatists, therapists who have no psychodrama experience,
creative arts therapists.
The other challenge has always been time but!!! I am giving up two days a
week at the hospital where I work, and am hoping to begin writing in the new
year. I am writing it here as a sign of my commitment.
This is not an invitation to nudge me, Adam!!!!:-)
Rebecca
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>
To: "Peter Howie" <peterhowie at macquariehouse.com.au>;
<list at grouptalkweb.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 4:53 PM
Subject: writing up papers
> Dear Peter, thanks for your feedback. I was intrigued with your final
> paragraph: PH: "I
> think writers revert to the stage of the double and really need some
> decent effective
> doubling type assistance to overcome some of this early stuff which saps
> conviction,
> undermines knowingness and confidence and bring up fears and worries."
>
> So, in the role of an editor, what specifically would you do? Or how
> would you teach
> consulting editors how to respond to submitted papers?
>
> I sent in a previous response to listserve about how I imagine
> editing---the idea of
> running a paper by someone as a preliminary, getting feedback and using it
> to revise...
> but no one responded to me.
> There's two sides to this dance. Even if the editors were optimally,
> perfectly
> encouraging, there's still a gap of time and space---rather than my direct
> physical
> presence--- so that the writer of the paper can lapse into the illusion /
> delusion that it
> doesn't matter, no one cares, and other rationalizations for a basic
> unwillingness to get
> back into the writing and revising process. Could that be happening?
>
> And maybe it's a dance that includes people being encouraged
> repeatedly, warmed up,
> as it were, to the challenge of wrestling, knowing that it will be drawn
> forward. There's
> work, and then after the review, more work, but it's also worthwhile.
>
> What do you think? Or others?
>
> Warmly, Adam
>
>
>
>
> Grouptalk mailing list
> List at grouptalkweb.org
> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>
More information about the List
mailing list