sociatry

[Adam Blatner]

nope, I've got a bunch of other fish to fry, and I'm not warmed up to the matrix of 
associations and ideas.
    Since I do like the process of discussion, a gentle encounter, I'll meet you part-way: 
If you give me some hints, ideas, tell me what you think so far, I'll play with you in an 
encouraging way, emphasizing what we can build.
    (It will be understood that I don't yet buy the hypothesis that such a thesis can be 
successfully developed, but I'll put that to the side for a while. Maybe I'll discover 
with you what your intuition is getting at.)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Edward Schreiber" <edwschreiber at earthlink.net>
To: "Adam Blatner" <adam at blatner.com>
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: sociatry


> Hi Adam,
> Well, here is my suggestion ----- and a serious one ----- why don't  you see
> if you can see these 4 forces ---- and see if you can describe them  ---- to me.
>
> Ed
>
>
> On Jan 18, 2008, at 9:12 PM, Adam Blatner wrote:
>
>> Dear Ed, I await an elucidation of the idea that... as you just  said, "The illness of 
>> society (of our culture, the world whole  civilization   for a fact) can be, from a 
>> Morenean point of view,  made so clear that we can find 4 mega-sociometric structures 
>> impacting, influencing all other structures.  These 4 mega- sociometric structures are 
>> what have to be understood and addressed  - and here is the mind-blower:  these 4 
>> forces (mega-structures)  are revealed in a group, family, organization, etc., with 
>> sociometry. We have to simply over-lay sociatric theories on top of  sociometry and 
>> then sociometry illuminates within a group the 4  mega-structures.
>>     Until I get that elucidation, I am wary. If you're right, it  would be great! 
>> Warmly, Adam
>>  p.s., what are the "mega-structures"? That might help me warm up  to what you're 
>> trying to say.
>