grouptalk discussions

[Adam Blatner]

Hi again, writing from the library: 
    ES the point is that the material deserves a few hours of attention, not here.
  AB: my point is that unless a thesis can be presented in coherent rational style, I can't readily address it. It might be buried in all manner of verbal and nonverbal complexification, plus the complexities of group dynamics. That might be okay for certain kinds of issues, but I am not yet convinced that you have come up with anything specific that can be talked about. So far all I've heard are platitudes, noble aspirations, and dire warnings. 
       Not that I can know whether you're "wrong," but all I can say is that isn't the way my mind and conversation works best. Warmly, adam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://grouptalkweb.org/pipermail/list_grouptalkweb.org/attachments/20080119/7c3fda23/attachment.html