connection between surrender and spontaneity
phil.carter at aut.ac.nz
Sun Nov 18 20:48:36 PST 2018
And when my 'personality' is enacted on the stage, i find a dissociation through strong identification, a longing and a rejection. A living paradox in which there is a type of friction that appears to be food for some process of life being lived through me. The stage is such a powerful means for both my enslavement and my liberation. As such, i surrender. All control. All knowing. And space comes. Space that i could easily describe as freedom or love or spontaneity. Now, I am the child. The living definition of creativity...
From: List <list-bounces at grouptalkweb.org> On Behalf Of Walter Logeman
Sent: Monday, 19 November 2018 4:59 PM
To: Philip Carter <phil.carter at aut.ac.nz>
Cc: list at grouptalkweb.org
Subject: Re: connection between surrender and spontaneity
I think Moreno used the word surrender in 'Theatre of Spontaneity' to say we should suspend disbelief as we watch a drama. Surrender to the illusion.
However this is not so helpful in your context. When you say "the unknown, the emerging, the life force, love, mystery, intrigue, innocence..." I think of the psychodrama concept of 'creativity'.
Moreno saw it as some sort of primary reality, out there, not part of our libido etc.
"The universe is infinite creativity . The visible definition of creativity is the "child." ("Who Shall Survive?" p39). Looking at it that way the life force is immediately linked to spontaneity. We can't get to creativity without spontaneity, and we need to a warm up to get to spontaneity.
It may relate to surrender in that cultural conserves get in the way of spontaneity. We say warm *up*, but sometimes the warm up is to let go. A 'deconserving' needed (see quote below), a warm up to "a willing, voluntary giving up, giving into, letting go, abandonment."
What do you think?
"These conserves determine our forms of creative expression. They may operate at one time as a disciplining force-at another time, as a hindrance. It is possible to reconstruct the situation of creativity at a time prior to the conserves which dominate our culture. The pre-conserve man,* the man of the first universe, had no musical notations with which he could project the musical experiences of his mind, no alphabetic notations with which he could project his words and thoughts into writing. He had no mathematical notations which became the basic language of science. Before he had selected from the inarticulate mass of sounds and vowels which developed into our languages he must have had a relation to the process of creativity different from modern man, if not in the source itself, certainly in projection and expression. When we removed, by a process of deconserving, one conserve after another from an actor, and nothing remained but his naked personality, the pre-conserve man came closer to our understanding. " "Who Shall Survive?" p40
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 15:18, Philip Carter <phil.carter at aut.ac.nz> wrote:
> What i mean here by ‘surrender’ is a willing, voluntary giving up,
> giving into, letting go, abandonment. To the unknown, the emerging,
> the life force, love, mystery, intrigue, innocence…
> From: List <list-bounces at grouptalkweb.org> On Behalf Of Philip Carter
> Sent: Monday, 19 November 2018 11:22 AM
> To: list at grouptalkweb.org
> Subject: connection between surrender and spontaneity
> In his writings anywhere, does Moreno make a connection between surrender and spontaneity?
> Grouptalk mailing list
> List at grouptalkweb.org
Grouptalk mailing list
List at grouptalkweb.org
More information about the List