<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Thank you Ann.<div>Ed</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On Aug 12, 2009, at 10:02 AM, Ann Hale wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"> <div>That "lady from New Zealand" is Ali Undorf-Lay, a senior policy analyst with the Federated Farmers of New Zealand and a recent Nuffield Scholar (like a Rhodes Scholar, etc). She traveled the world twice last year visiting farmers and farmer organizations, in India, Ireland, Turkey, Great Britain, Japan, Switzerland, Canada, the US, China, etc. The question of sustainability is a big issue for farmers. The tax structures alone are archaic. Most countries tax according to land mass, whether it is in productive use or not. The farmer throughout the US carries an unfair proportion of taxation based on these old tax codes. They can't afford to farm anymore. The global issues of food production (we DO have to eat something to stay alive, and the world has a lot of hungry people in it) and the amount of land it takes to operate a successful farm is a major world concern. The farmers are affected by global warming as well.</div> <div> </div> <div>What does it have to do with psychodrama and sociometry? These people assemble in groups to discuss concerns. They have to be activists to protect the land from encroaching development, recreation vehicles in the paddock, etc. They need skills of engagement, and the ability to role reverse and strategize. They have to use action methods for planning and active encounters in conflicts that can become quite heated when the government wants you to open your lands to tourists all year round, despite the growing season and the disturbancs to livestock.</div> <div> </div> <div>Psychodrama must be viewed as open for application wherever people assemble and have the opportunity to engage in explorations of their concerns.</div> <div> </div> <div>Ali gave us wonderful examples of the application of Morenoean methods in non-therapy settings. She should not be dismissed as "the lady from New Zealand". She is worthy of her name being remembered.</div> <div>Ann Hale</div> <div> </div> <div> </div> <div>----- Original Message ----- </div> <blockquote style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <div style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><b>From:</b> <a title="ablatner@verizon.net" href="mailto:ablatner@verizon.net">Adam Blatner</a> </div> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>To:</b> <a title="ibanaco@gmail.com" href="mailto:ibanaco@gmail.com">Ivo Banaco</a> </div> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Cc:</b> <a title="list@grouptalkweb.org" href="mailto:list@grouptalkweb.org">list@grouptalkweb.org</a> </div> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, August 12, 2009 9:20 AM</div> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Subject:</b> Re: sociatry ideas</div> <div><br></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2">okay, okay, sorrry. I think that lady from New Zealand was offering some specific examples---though I didn't see how they reflected specifically psychodramatic or morenian methods.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> I do want to encourage positive social action and the general ideal of sociatry is fine. I do think the methods can play a role in the unfolding of an evolving culture. I'm interested enough, as a matter of fact, to wonder what folks are actually coming up with, and that motivated me to press in the opposite direction (i.e., press for specifics). I realize that this may have been more inhibiting to some than focusing. </font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> So I like the let's have all the hats approach. Thanks Peter and Ivo and Ed... warmly, adam</font></div> <blockquote style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </div> <div style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><b>From:</b> <a title="ibanaco@gmail.com" href="mailto:ibanaco@gmail.com">Ivo Banaco</a> </div> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>To:</b> <a title="adam@blatner.com" href="mailto:adam@blatner.com">Adam Blatner</a> </div> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Cc:</b> <a title="peterhowie@macquariehouse.com.au" href="mailto:peterhowie@macquariehouse.com.au">Peter Howie</a> ; <a title="list@grouptalkweb.org" href="mailto:list@grouptalkweb.org">list@grouptalkweb.org</a> </div> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, August 12, 2009 6:26 AM</div> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Subject:</b> Re: sociatry ideas</div> <div><br></div>Hi Peter, <div><br></div> <div>I love your blue wisdom hat. I resonate with your discerned words. I certainly can see my flaws and insufficient explained arguments. If using vigorously my black hat I wouldn't have written a single e-mail to the group. If I would formed a team to think about problems and trying to come out with some solutions I'd certainly want Adam to be there. But for the sake of this particular context here at grouptalk I find Adam's iconoclast attitude particularly unproductive, though it certainly help me sharpening the arguments. Things like separating the whole argument in parts and then pointing the flaws is like breaking a house and saying that none of the parts are useful to make a shelter. Like deconstructionism have shown is very easy to dismantle an argument to a point where meaning is nothing and you can say one thing or another that is all part of the same round circle. Combining a "<span class="Apple-style-span" style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial">rigorously rational approach" and a moving forward it's a totally different and more demanding thing. For that we need all the hats available...</span></div> <div><br></div> <div>Thanks for Bono's reference Peter.</div> <div><br></div> <div>Ivo</div> <div><br></div> <div><br></div> <div><br> <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Adam Blatner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ablatner@verizon.net">ablatner@verizon.net</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"> <div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word" bgcolor="#ffffff"> <div><font face="Arial" size="2">Hi Peter, thanks for this. Yes, I like de Bono's six thinking hats very much, and your analysis is good. </font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> There's another bit of group process. Because of the relative lack of support---a few folks have said online or back channeled that they agree with my more rigorously rational approach---which comes across black hat--- but it occurs to me that there's no need to say anything. If the group chooses to go with Ed's style, that's okay with me. I can restrain myself. </font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> Warmly, Adam </font></div> <blockquote style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <div> <div></div> <div class="h5"> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </div> <div style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial"><b>From:</b> <a title="peterhowie@macquariehouse.com.au" href="mailto:peterhowie@macquariehouse.com.au" target="_blank">Peter Howie</a> </div> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>To:</b> <a title="list@grouptalkweb.org" href="mailto:list@grouptalkweb.org" target="_blank">grouptalk Listserv</a> </div> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:32 PM</div> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Subject:</b> Re: sociatry ideas</div> <div><br></div> <div><span style="WORD-SPACING: 0px; FONT: 16px Calibri; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; BORDER-COLLAPSE: separate"> <div><span style="FONT-SIZE: medium">Dear Adam and others,</span></div> <div><span style="FONT-SIZE: medium"><br></span></div> <div><span style="FONT-SIZE: medium">I have been having fun with Edward de Bono's creativity ideas recently and at different times in the past. I am not sure how influential he is in the US but in Australia he has found a ready home. One of his ideas was the idea of the six thinking hats - google away for any number of articles. It seems to me that some of the discussion here can be looked at in a few ways. Role theory would be one but requires more than we have produced here. So the six thinking hats is an attenuated type of taxonomic role theory (that is defining the roles not by what is seen and done but buy the purpose of the actions). Given this I kind of get the sense that Adam you are often taking the black hat approach or feeling the need for the black hat and this leads you to socratically pick apart arguments, point our logical flaws in many ways act something between a lawyer and an academic marking a paper. Whereas others here, such as Ed could be seen as using red hat thinking where they are passionately presenting their ideas, wisdom and worries, sort of an enthusiastic Cassandra while Ivo is working between yellow hat which is a logical and positive approach and a green hat which is a creative, lateral type approach sort of like a wild and refined scientist-philosopher. In writing this I am aware that I could be seen to be using a blue hat approach which relates more to group process. >From the blue hat perspective and working from the 6 thinking hats paradigm, I would recommend that folks respond from the same hat for a while before changing hats. Try experimenting with unfamiliar hats. I reckon Ed can critique his ideas as well as anyone and Ivo can see the looseness of his ideas and Adam can't hide the underlying positivity of his posts.</span></div> <div><span style="FONT-SIZE: medium"><br></span></div> <div><span style="FONT-SIZE: medium">de Bono conceived the purpose of the 6 hats as furthering creativity in thinking. Perhaps here we are trying to use argument to develop relationships which is always a torturous path. Maybe better to develop relationships and then develop the arguments?</span></div> <div><span style="FONT-SIZE: medium"><br></span></div> <div><span style="FONT-SIZE: medium">Cheers for the moment</span></div> <div><span style="FONT-SIZE: medium"><br></span></div> <div><span style="FONT-SIZE: medium">Peter</span></div> <div><br></div> <div><br></div> <div> <div>Peter Howie B.Sc, TEP <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div>Managing Director</div> <div>The Moreno Collegium for Human Centred Learning, Research and Development</div> <div>0411 873 851</div> <div><a href="http://www.morenocollegium.com.au" target="_blank">www.morenocollegium.com.au</a></div> <div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><br></span><br></div><br> <div> <div>On 12/08/2009, at 8:19 AM, Adam Blatner wrote:</div><br> <blockquote type="cite"><span style="WORD-SPACING: 0px; FONT: medium Calibri; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; BORDER-COLLAPSE: separate"> <div bgcolor="#ffffff"> <div><font face="Arial" size="2">Dear Ivo, sorry, I find your effort at being specific to be a weaving of more abstract ideals. For example regarding your example: Specifically what would you imagine anyone doing regarding the financial crisis? Is there any even rationally proposed evidence that identifies one step in this that is unequivocally affected by anything psychodramatic, sociometric, etc.--- (Of course we can say, oh, if only politicians were more deeply concerned about the plight of the people...)</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> We must remember, though, that many people in this catastrophe were greedy and childishly gullible---both those who sold the mortgages and those who bought them. Who are the innocent victims and what specifically (oh I am so sorry for harping on this nasty word) do you suggest to remedy the problem? Should those who were foolish and greedy be allowed so suffer the consequences of their folly? If not, what else would you propose?</font></div> <blockquote style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(0,0,0) 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----</div> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(228,228,228)"><b>From:</b><span> </span><a title="ibanaco@gmail.com" href="mailto:ibanaco@gmail.com" target="_blank">Ivo Banaco</a></div> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>To:</b><span> </span><a title="adam@blatner.com" href="mailto:adam@blatner.com" target="_blank">Adam Blatner</a></div> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Cc:</b><span> </span><a title="list@grouptalkweb.org" href="mailto:list@grouptalkweb.org" target="_blank">list@grouptalkweb.org</a></div> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Sent:</b><span> </span>Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:20 PM</div> <div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Subject:</b><span> </span>Re: sociatry ideas</div> <div><br></div>Hi Adam and all, <div><br></div> <div>I understand your concerns about the excessive abstraction. In any given area in politics for example I could give you several examples of how the tools generated by psychodrama, sociodrama and for that matter all the so called "consciousness movement" could help. The problem with the specifics is that they could easily loose track of the more general concern of this group. Loosing the forest for a tree is a risk that I don't want to take either. But OK, let's go for it. I will give you a specific...:-)</div> <div><br></div> <div>The US economic crisis:</div> <div><br></div> <div>Look to the unemployment numbers: about 15 million, a historical number by any standard - 2 years ago unemployment was at more or less 7 million people. </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> ab irrelevant</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div>Most of the money is being spent in the rebuilding of the financial system and in some highly questionable economic projects.</div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> Name which ones are questionable; describe the consequences of refusing to do this.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div>There are no tools given to politicians, to my knowledge, that help them to look beyond the numbers. Why the financial system broke? If we can see beyond we can look to the financial theatre, the actors, the spontaneity (or the lack of it), the reactivity, the lack of reason, the exuberance, the egoistic approach, etc.</div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> remember greed and the willingness to cheat, to almost cheat, to fudge the truth, to say you earn more than you do, to promise unrealistically</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> but that's not my point. The problem with spontaneity is that the Morenian definition begs the question: an effective response to an old situation (is part of the definition) -- but we don't know what will be in fact effective. So the argument is circular. If the politicians had true spontaneity they'd be automatically wise. And of course (saying this sarcastically) we know how to teach them that. Right.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> </font> What is being done? Simply is being delivered a lot of money to the same guys with the same instruments to mess it up again.</div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> aB: I kind of agree with you here and am not sure of the actual rationale. It does seem foolish.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> IB </font> What could be done? A fundamental intervention, one that can combine all the good stuff that was created (that become possible, for example, to spread the risk, turning some important assets like houses more affordable to poor families - the so called subprime families, etc) with what I would call the subjective and inter-subjective interventions.</div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> AB: I am totally bewildered by this---haven't the foggiest idea what you're talking about!</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> How spread the risk? what does that mean? How does this deal with anything Morenian?</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> IB </font> Any important player in the market must have skills beyond its obvious technical abilities.</div> <div> </div> <div> Intersubjective skills, emotional intelligence and so.</div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> name one and show how it would apply. Otherwise</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div>They are wonderful and highly respected scientific literature supporting this (like Howard Gardner multiple intelligences). But this is a major and complex educational problem.</div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> This is the problem--- and almost a cop-out; it's like saying if people could be smart, we'd solve things. But it's not clear that smart people who were psychologically minded would have any ideas that you don't have. So I await more specifics.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div>Our societies gave over the years an increasingly value to cognitive skills that yes, it's true, helped to promote technological progress and material well being. But today we all know that this is not enough and could be danger not only to a particular nation but to the world at large. Society as a whole must gave (urgently I would say) value to several dimensions of the human being. Today an educated man and woman that will go leading business, families, political affairs must have a new sensibility and see things that others are blind to. Psychodrama courses for example could be a priority education project combined with the core training of a given person.</div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> ab: see point above. You're implying that holistically enlightened people would be more effective than non-holistically-psychologically enlightened people. sounds plausible, but you haven't made the case that knowing sociometry, psychodrama, or anything Moreno taught---which, though I value it---I'm not yet willing to make serious claims for--- will be proven to do a better job.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> as you say, it's a complex problem...</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div> All psychological literacy (a wonderful term that I get from you) is important to all leaders not in order to absolutize that particular type of knowledge but to give it the place that is deserved (this is particularly important, because to absolutize one dimension of life is a big mistake and a very easy one to make). </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> <span> </span></font>A "sociatric politician" would have that in the primordial agenda and not just in footnotes don't you think? </div> <div> AB: I can't disagree, because it's so general. You're saying that a politician who is psychologically sensitive and aware would do a better job. I would like to agree, but any scientific or even simply rational person would require you to break the whole idea down into very very specific competencies; test whether each one is very or only slightly relevant to the goal task; and assess how much knowing Morenian stuff makes a difference in policy development. Lacking that tight, meticulous analysis, you're free to make any claims you like and they can't be disproven.</div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div> IB In a tomorrow's world a economic crisis would not be compensate with 7 new million job loss. We would easily know the tremendous impact at all subjective and intersubjective levels in a family or in a person (emotional, financial, and all the imbalances caused by the situation).</div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> AB: Is subjective and intersubjective the latest in psychobabble terms? What about bio-psycho-social, or is that too outdated?</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> Who is the we, how would we know it, the impact at all subjective levels-- can we know the impact of ANYTHING at ALL subjective levels? We as outsiders or as the person feeling it? etc. And who would the people be who are intersubjectively interacting,</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div> A business leader would try to reformulate their business with their human resources in a different way.</div> <div> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> ab: name one specific example</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div> People would not be just a number.</div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> That implies that all managers or politicians (not most but all) are treating people only as numbers. An easy claim, but not if you interview them or look at the situation closely.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div> Things would be worked out differently.</div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> This is the kind of argument that says in effect that if people would be smarter, they'd be better, and then everything would be better. It's unprovable and I can't imagine one specific example of what you're talking about.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> This is the point of concretization, of setting a scene in psychodrama. Clients in talk therapy tend to talk this way, generalities. We need to cut through abstractions and find out what the actual situation is. If I can't imagine a concrete example I really don't know what you're talking about and it is possible that in believing your own abstractions you're weaving a web of self-delusion that works for you, satisfies your feelings of coherence. Lots of folks live this way----believing in the web or network of loosely assembled platitudes.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> <span> </span></font>For example with the natural and frequent use of psychodrama and sociodrama tools other reality surplus would come out, creativity would be raised and solutions be found. Creativity is not just faith or utopia or wishful thinking. It's an endogenous power of the human being that have to be recognize. </div> <div> AB: well, sure. That's kind of my point: I think that as psychological literacy in general penetrates the culture that there may be a development of mental flexibility and the foundations of more consciousness can be built on this---but it would require a thousand other components---political, technical, economic, etc.---also part of the growing infrastructure--- and it will likely take generations if not centuries.</div> <div> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> IB <span> </span></font>This is just some quick and not worked thoughts about specific applications in business, leadership, social values and above all education. This is just not just about being aware that psychology and consciousness are important matters to social life. This is about how to integrate in the social activities all the good knowledge that We are being finding without loosing all the good practices that part of what we do already.</div> <div> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> aB: The question is whether staying at the level of affirming ideals is a lot more effective than the obviously more illusory song verse below.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div>IB The challenges of the integration of the new to a well stablish cultural conserve it's the challenge of life itself, I believe. Some of you guys in grouptalk should have an important voice in political decision making in this crisis. AB: What do you mean "should"? Which ones of us?</div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div>IB Have Obama called you to ask an opinion? Do you care at all or just keep just wondering like in the Dave Mathews's song: </div> <div><span style="FONT-SIZE: 14px; COLOR: rgb(101,101,101); LINE-HEIGHT: 20px; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">"Tell me everything will be OK if I just stay on my knees and keep praying believing in something </span></div> <div><span style="FONT-SIZE: 14px; COLOR: rgb(101,101,101); LINE-HEIGHT: 20px; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Tell me everything is all taken care of by those qualified to take care of it all." </span></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> AB: I'm reminded of the anecdote of JLM doing one of his first Theatre of Spontaneity, inviting the audience members to come up and be king, and help the chaotic and struggling remnants of the Austro-Hungarian Empire to find a way to accommodate to the changes and realities of the post WWI world. </font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> If Obama called me and asked my opinion, I'd have a few things to say, but they'd be pretty obvious and easily arguable. Nor am I sure that I'm ultimately "right" or smarter than him. </font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div>All the best, Ivo ab: enough. talk to you later.</div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font><font face="Arial" size="2"></font><font face="Arial" size="2"></font><br></div> <div>PS: About the word Sociatry. What I find is that<span> </span><b><i><span style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline">iatros</span></i></b>, is indeed a physician but iatry comes from<b><i><span style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline"><span> </span>iatreia</span></i></b><span> </span>and that is not the healer is the heal itself...and if it is true (and I'm not a specialist) will make all the difference...</div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font><font face="Arial" size="2"></font><font face="Arial" size="2"></font><font face="Arial" size="2"></font><font face="Arial" size="2"></font><font face="Arial" size="2"></font><font face="Arial" size="2"></font><br><br> <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Adam Blatner<span> </span><span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ablatner@verizon.net" target="_blank">ablatner@verizon.net</a>></span><span> </span>wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid"> <div bgcolor="#ffffff"> <div><font face="Arial" size="2">Dear Ivo and all,</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> 1. </font>August 10, IB: Right Adam, but feeling that your point 4 misleading. In WSS Moreno finds the root of Sociatry in WSS in Socius - the other fellow and iatreia - healing; </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> AB: sorry for the pedantry but I looked it up: Iatros is physician from iasthai ancient greek for heal... </font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> socius Latin companion </font></div> <div> </div> <div> 2. IB All of Moreno's ideas tried to fight the doctor-patient model, and I don't think that sociatry relate to that at all, although I can see your point.</div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> AB: Startling statement, unclear how that seems so for you. There's a little bit of truth re his wanting less authoritative group psychotherapy, but his behavior at his sanatarium was quite in keeping with the doctor-patient model.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> 3. IB</font> But I admit this is a matter of taste, like your dislike about tele.</div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> AB: Please don't give people the impression that I dislike tele, but rather think that while the dynamic is of central importance in a more holistic psychology, the term perhaps might be better understood by non-psychodramatists if called something else, such as rapport.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> 4. IB </font> For me Sociatry calls for a higher level of intervention in society, a inter/ trans disciplinary approach to the socius with a fundamental emphasis to treat it. Quoting Moreno. "The art and skill of the sociatrist will depend upon a synthesis of knowledge toward which all social and psychiatric sciences will have made their contribution." And that doesn't exist yet as such, but we have all the ingredients...we have to cook them!<span> </span></div> <div><span> AB: Fine, when you've cooked up something specific let us know.</span></div> <div><span></span> </div> <div><span> 5 IB Of course we can always question: If that is so what is the difference between sociatry and politics. It should be none but it is not the case at this moment. What sociatry could bring to politics is a type of knowledge (e.g. sociometry, group dynamics, all the invisible structures, cultural bias, etc,) that seems to escape most of politicians today. </span></div> <div><span> AB: Sure, it's nice to imagine that our political leaders could know all sorts of things and that this would help, but can you give a single example of how a political leader would act differently, think differently, knowing the above? I'm not saying they wouldn't, but integrating knowledge and ranking its relevance is a problem.</span></div> <div><span> More, it is unrealistic to just dump all we know into an expert's lap and expect the expert to know how to pick out what is more or less relevant. (It's surprising how many less-experienced psychotherapists or psychiatrists will present a case by dumping out information in such a way as to demonstrate they they haven't begun to sort out what is more or less important---see my paper on my website on the art of case presentation.)</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span> 6.<span> </span></span><span>In the future Sociatry could well be the real political action.. why not as sociatry could not exist as such (if it aims a large scale social intervention) without politics? AB: The problem is giving more specifics, more definition: One could also say "Makingbetter" will be the real sociatry, which would also be the real political action.</span></div> <div><span></span> </div> <div><span><font face="Arial" size="2"> Perhaps this quibbling about terms is unnecessary. I certainly want to support enthusiasm, and the belief that our field has important tools to introduce into the mainline of the culture. I have put this idea into many of my writings.</font></span></div> <div><span><font face="Arial" size="2"> But an excess of abstraction just might evoke a counter-reaction, the appellation of "psychobabble," or some such, so I occasionally comment on this.</font></span></div> <div><span><font face="Arial" size="2"></font></span> </div> <div><span><font face="Arial" size="2"> <span> </span></font></span>Best, Ivo AB And good wishes to you...</div> <div> <span> </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'">"The term derives from a Latin and Greek root, the one is socius, the “other fellow”, the other iatreia, healing." see above...<span> </span></span><br><br></div> <blockquote style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(0,0,0) 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <div> <div> <div> <div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Adam Blatner<span> </span><span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ablatner@verizon.net" target="_blank">ablatner@verizon.net</a>></span><span> </span>wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid"> <div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word" bgcolor="#ffffff"> <div><font face="Arial" size="2">Okay, let's see. The world is in trouble in thousands of different ways at many levels. What can "sociatry" do? Which methods are useful with groups beyond the sick role? (i.e., beyond psychotherapy).</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> 1. Starting small: Consider the feminist notion that the personal is political and reverse it. In the 1970s the institution of the happy nuclear family was questioned. Might it for some be a prison? Questioning social arrangements is one example. Could therapy include social action? Groups whose task is to change more than the consciousness of its own members generate new types of group dynamics, concerning as how best to accomplish its chosen tasks.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> 2. Recognize that sociometry and psychodramatic methods constitute at most only 23.2% of the many different kinds of skills and knowledge involved in social action. Things like composing an effective letter, lobbying, etc. --- there are hundreds or thousands of such components that transcend any particular discipline--- including the skill bases of rhetoric, advertising, spin-doctoring, propaganda, all the elements of politics, lobbying, newsletter editing, community organizing, etc. etc.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> 3. In a larger sense, much of politics through<font face="Times New Roman" size="3">out history (including some military efforts) have been rationalized as promoting what was for the time viewed as an improvement on the previous system. For example, feudalism, as prone to tyrrany as at was, was nevertheless believed to be an improvement of some degree of order and predictability, better than what had been happening in the earlier "dark ages" in which people felt far too vulnerable to robbers, invaders, and pure barbarism. In other words:</font></font></div> <div> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> 4. The problem with sociatry is the problem with fascism: The doctor-patient model of the 1940s (relating to the -iatros Greek root meaning physician) involved a wise knower-how-to-diagnose and treat and a submissive patient. This does not apply well to large social groupings. It is not at all clear that anyone knows how to fix it all and can garner adequate consensus for "I'll just tell you what to do and then you take this medicine and follow my 'orders.' type of management.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> I'm just noting that the word may be misleading. The spirit Moreno advocated is something I share: Let's apply what we're learning in psychology, sociology, and every other field to efforts in every institution---political, educational, economic, clubs, recreation, medicine, etc. I saw his idea as an interdisciplinary vision during an era in which fields were more compartmentalized. Ed's advocacy of social action has merit, but awaiting specifics, I'm not sure that our field has more to offer than other fields. It certainly has some to offer, though!</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> 5. I'm continuing to do adult education classes and weaving in principles from role theory, the idea of externalization and personification of defenses (i.e., imagining that they can be played, given voice, imagined to be little seductive con-men, little Bernie Madoffs or whoever). , and other Morenian ideas along with the contributions of others--- all part of the aforementioned idea of "psychological literacy" or promoting the continued integration of the insights of psychology in life.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> (In a larger sense, I think sociatry refers in large part to this cultural trend towards bringing psychology into the mainstream of culture rather than its having operated at the periphery as a semi-irrelevant procedure for folks at the margins of society)</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"><font face="Arial" size="2"></font></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"><font face="Arial" size="2"> 6. Writing, publishing, presenting at other conferences, and talking about how psychodramatic and sociometric methods might have applications beyond its own field... I think these are small but not meaningless efforts. A measure of humility is okay.</font></font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> 7. Continuing efforts (and modeling) in integrating good ideas from other fields will also help to break down perceptions of psychodrama as somewhat insular.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> Those are a few things perhaps that can advance the idea of our field's relevance to social activism.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> The targets include not only global warming (as Ed noted), but thousands of other worthy causes.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> Some of these, interestingly, are complex: The question regarding health care for me, for example, is to what degree I support the present kluged-together bill or exert myself for the cause of a single-payer system (as supported by the Physicians for a National Health Plan)? It could be argued that in the present climate, a compromise is necessary and that single-payer has zero chance. On the other hand, the present bill is so fraught with compromises that it will be unsatisfactory in many ways, the problem will "heat up" further, and more radical surgery will be frustrated because "we already tried socialized medicine" (when in fact we only put our toe in the water, so to speak). So political decision-making is a problem in weighing which tactic to use in the interim.</font></div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div> <div><font face="Arial" size="2"> Warmly, Adam</font></div></div><br>Grouptalk mailing list<br><a href="mailto:List@grouptalkweb.org" target="_blank">List@grouptalkweb.org</a><br><a href="http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org" target="_blank">http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org</a><br><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div> <div><br></div> <hr> <div><br></div><br>No virus found in this incoming message.<br>Checked by AVG -<span> </span><a href="http://www.avg.com" target="_blank">www.avg.com</a><span> </span><br>Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.49/2294 - Release Date: 08/10/09 06:10:00<br> <div><br></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div><br></div> <div><br></div> <hr> <div><br></div><br>No virus found in this incoming message.<br>Checked by AVG -<span> </span><a href="http://www.avg.com" target="_blank">www.avg.com</a><span> </span><br>Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.50/2296 - Release Date: 08/11/09 06:10:00<br></blockquote>Grouptalk mailing list<br><a href="mailto:List@grouptalkweb.org" target="_blank">List@grouptalkweb.org</a><br><a href="http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org" target="_blank">http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org</a><br></div></span></blockquote></div><br></div></div><div><br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div> <hr> <div class="im"><div><br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div>Grouptalk mailing list<br><a href="mailto:List@grouptalkweb.org" target="_blank">List@grouptalkweb.org</a><br><a href="http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org" target="_blank">http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org</a><br></div><div><br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div> <div class="im"> <hr><div><br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div><br>No virus found in this incoming message.<br>Checked by AVG - <a href="http://www.avg.com" target="_blank">www.avg.com</a> <br></div> <div class="im">Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.50/2296 - Release Date: 08/11/09 06:10:00<br></div><div><br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div><div><br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div></blockquote></div><br>Grouptalk mailing list<br><a href="mailto:List@grouptalkweb.org">List@grouptalkweb.org</a><br><a href="http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org" target="_blank">http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org</a><br><br></blockquote></div><br></div><div> <br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div><hr><div><br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div><br>No virus found in this incoming message.<br>Checked by AVG - <a href="http://www.avg.com">www.avg.com</a> <br>Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.51/2297 - Release Date: 08/11/09 18:27:00<br></blockquote><div> <br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div><hr><div><br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div>Grouptalk mailing list<br><a href="mailto:List@grouptalkweb.org">List@grouptalkweb.org</a><br>http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org<br></blockquote><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">Grouptalk mailing list</div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; "><a href="mailto:List@grouptalkweb.org">List@grouptalkweb.org</a></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; "><a href="http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org">http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org</a></div> </blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>