JL & Husserl

[M.K. Hudgins]

As a clinical psychologist I believe science is important in understanding what actually does make people change. 

The history I come from is that of research tested experiential therapy.  There are theories, principles of change, client markers that show not only outcome data, but more importantly process data that flows through a session. 

While TSM has not a huge amount of research we have returned to it again n again. Scott Giacomucci is now a leading researcher in taking theory into practice.  

Kate 

Kate Hudgins, Ph,D, TEP
Therapeutic Spiral International
www.therapeuticspiralmodel.com

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 7, 2021, at 8:46 PM, edwschreiber at earthlink.net wrote:
> 
> Experiencing is (was) Moreno's obsession as a means for understanding.
> The experience of the Godhead, this field of intelligence that the science of
> quantum physics teaches, is an intelligence to be found in the realm of experience,
> as Moreno realized and taught to us.   My understanding of it - is this -
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> Sent: Oct 7, 2021 8:31 PM
> To: , 
> Subject: Re: JL & Husserl
> 
> There is nothing silly or demeaned about Moreno's understanding of the Godhead.
> Prefer to not denigrate.  Please.
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> Sent: Oct 7, 2021 8:22 PM
> To:
> Subject: JL & Husserl
>  
> Hi Rob,
> Thanks for these references.
> Yes – Moreno was keen on existentialism – especially Kierkegaard as birthing what JL saw as the
> ‘intellectual’ phase of it.
> These days it is very crude to lump Heidegger and Husserl in the existentialist camp; even as
> phenomenological existentialists.
> But we can see what JL was valiantly trying to accomplish. A vitalized ‘I-Exist’ consciousness as
> further emergence [if not evolution] of 19th C German Idealism post- his beloved Vienna.
>  
> Our difficulty is that our contemporary culture is hell-bent on forms of ‘science’. We all want to
> understand some-one and some-thing before we want to value them or ‘it’.
> If IAGP is to connect to this ‘science’ malady we will need to find ways to show we see the limits of
> understanding as obsession.
>  
> I just saw a documentary on Elon Musk’s space [Mars] probe. Pundits were saying Musk is a
> prophet for the Universe [God-head] that is calling us to a new inter-planetary intelligence. If that is
> the case should we then run small group-work dressed in astronaut suits so we are socio-metrically
> more aligned to the God-head?
> Of course it was easier in the 1970s to go hippie and just drop-out. Wear flowers and not space
> suits.
>  
> My understanding is Husserl got gobbled up by the science of Lacan’s 1980s layered symbology.
> It is entertaining to ponder what Moreno’s antidote to that would have been.
>  
> Best Til Next,
> Brendan
>  
> Grouptalk mailing list
> List at grouptalkweb.org
> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>  
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Grouptalk mailing list
> List at grouptalkweb.org
> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org